A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.

About this Item

Title: A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Author: Jewel, John, 1522-1571.
Publication: Imprinted at London :: In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes,; Anno. 1565.
Rights/Permissions: To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
Subject terms: Harding, Thomas, 1516-1572. -- Answere to Maister Juelles chalenge.; Catholic Church -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.; Catholic Church -- Doctrines -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item: http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04474.0001.001
Cite this Item: "A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04474.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.

Pages

M. Hardinge. The .1. Diuision.

In this Sacrament after Consecration, (175)* 1.1 nothinge in Substance remaineth, that was before, neither Breade, nor VVine, but onely the Accidentes of Breade and wine: as their forme, and shape, sauour, smel, coloure, weight, and suche the like, which here haue their beinge miraculousely with∣out their subiecte: for as muche as* 1.2 after Consecration, there is none other substance, then the sub∣stance of the Bodie and Bloude of our Lorde, whiche is not affected with such Accidentes, as the Scho∣lastical Doctours terme it. VVhiche Doctrine hath alwaies, though not with these precise termes, (176)* 1.3 beene taught, and beleeued from the beginning, and dependeth of the Article of Transubstan∣tiation. For if the substance of Breade and VVine be changed into the Substance of the Bodie and Bloud of our Lorde (177)* 1.4 (which is cōstantly affirmed by al the learned and Ancient Fathers of the Church) it foloweth by a necessarie sequele in nature, and by▪ dri••te of Reason, that then the Accidentes onely remaine. For witnesse and proufe whereof, I wil not let to recite certaine moste manifest sayeinges of the olde, and best approued Doctours.

Notes

* 1.1

The .175. vntru∣eth. for the Sub¦stance of the Breade and vvine remaineth stil, as shal appeare.

Back to content
* 1.2

Vntrueth, 2•• before.

Back to content
* 1.3

The .176. vntru∣eth. For this Doctrine vvas neither belee∣••ed, nor taught from the begin¦ninge.

Back to content
* 1.4

The .177. vntru∣eth. This Kinde of Real, and Material change is not affirmed by any Father.

Back to content