The B. of Sarisburie.
M. Hardinge wandreth stil aboute his Figures, and out of Goddes Omni∣potent Power, diuiseth a very féeble argument. For thus he reasoneth:
Christe maketh mention of his Ascension into Heauen:
Ergo, His Bodie is Really in the Sacrament.
He hath no iust cause to be offended, for that I lay his Logique thus abroade. It behooueth the Reader to sée, by what force eche thinge is prooued. Uerily, if he Conclude not thus, he renneth at riotte, and Concludeth nothinge.
As touchinge Christes Ascension into Heauen, S. Augustine, & other Ancient Fathers séeme to vse the same, to prooue, That there is no such grosse presence in the Sacrament.* 1.1 S. Augustine thereof writeth thus, Si ergo videritis Filium ho∣minis Ascendentem &c. If you shal see the Sonne of man ascendinge vp, where he was be∣fore &c. And what is this? Hereby he openeth that thinge, wherewith they were offended. For they thought, he woulde geue them his Bodie: But he tolde them, that he would Ascende into Heauen, and that whole as he was. When ye shal see the Sonne of man Ascende thither, where he was before, then shal you see, that he geueth not his Bodie in suche sorte, as you i∣magine: then shal you perceiue, that his Grace is not consumed, or wasted by morsels.
S. Chrysostome saith, as it is before alleged, Ad alta oportet eum contendere, qui ad hoc Corpus accedit. Aquilarum, non graculorum, est haec Mensa. He must mounte on high, that wil come to this Bodie. For this Table serueth for Egles, and not for Iayes. So saith S. Hierome, Ascendamus cum Domino in Coenaculum magnum, stratum, & mū∣datum: & accipiamus ab eo Sursum Calicem Noui Testamenti. Let vs goe vp with the Lorde (into Heauen) into that greate Parlar spreadde,* 1.2 and cleane: and let vs receiue of him a∣boue the Cuppe of the New Testament.* 1.3 The like might be alleged of other moe Ca∣tholique, and Ancient Fathers. For Cyrillus saith in most plaine woordes, Sa∣cramentum nostrum Hominis manducationem non asserit, mentes credentium ad crassas cogitationes irreligiosè inducens.* 1.4 Our Sacrament auoucheth not the Eatinge of a Man, lea∣dinge the mindes of the Faithful in vngodly manner to grosse (or fleashly) cogitations.
Doublesse it séemeth to make very simple proufe of M. Hardinges side, to say thus:
Christes Bodie is Ascended into Heauen: Ergo, The same Bodie is Really, and Fleashely in the Sacrament. But M. Hardinge wil say, Christe speaking to the Capernaites, made mention of his Omnipotent Power, Therfore in ye Sacrament there must néedes be a Fleashly Presence.* 1.5 First, as it is before alleged, Nicolas Lyra saith, Christes woordes to the Capernaites perteine nothing to the Sacrament, but onely vnto the Spiritual Eatinge of Christes Bodie, whiche in deede is the Omnipotent Worke of the Spirite of God.
And againe, would M. Harding make al the worlde beléeue, if Christes Body be not fleashly, and grossely in the Sacrament, according to his fantasie, that then God therefore is not Omnipotent? Uerily, the olde Catholique Fathers acknow∣lege Gods Omnipotencie in the Water of Baptisme: yet is not Christe therefore