enemies of the Catholike Churche, cānot charge the Catholikes with dissension in any of the groūdes,
and Articles of our Faithe. As for smal matters, and questions disputable on bothe sides, they maie
therein dissent one learned man from an other without blame, the Faithe remaininge inuiolated.
But, good sir Defender, what meante you to name the Nominals and Reals? Vnderstande you
what they be? If a man shoulde vpon the sudda••ne demaunde of you that question, perhaps you
would be to seekinge of an answere. Sir if you be an Oxforde man, as I suppose you be, you maie
remember, if euer you learned your Logike after that trade it was taught in, when we resorted
to the Paruis there, what adoo was made in daily disputations for exercise of younge wittes, a∣boute
Genus and Species, and the reste of the Vniuersals: VVhether they were termini Primae,
or Secundae intentionis, whether they were entia Realia, or Rationis. VVhiche is a matter per∣teigninge
to Logike, not to Diuinitie. Nowe some Schoolemen be of the opinion, that the fiue Vni∣uersals
be termini, or nomina secundae intentionis: And they be called thereof Nominals.
Some holde opinion, they are entia realia, and thereof they be named Reals, &c. In the be∣halfe
of those Holy Religious menne, we tell you, ye are to blame to belie them. For what Discipline
and order of Life so euer they haue addicted them selues vnto, for better oportunitie to serue God:
truthe is truthe, they put not greate Holinesse (as ye saie) in eatinge of Fishe, nor of Hearbes: in
Shoes, nor in Sandals: in Linnen, nor in VVollen garmentes: in white, nor in blacke: in broade, nor in
narrowe Crownes: in goinge on Patens, nor on the bare grounde: in girdinge them selues, nor in
beinge Vngirded. They be not so ignorant, as to put Holinesse in suche outwarde thinges, though
their obedience performed in the humble obseruation of these outwarde thinges accordinge to their
rule, be an Holy thinge. These thinges they vse for restrainte of their will, and for discipline, ac∣cordinge
to the order, and rule, vnder whiche, the better to serue God, they haue promised obediently
and humbly to liue. Neither put they more holinesse in the thinges by you scoffed at, them Elias did
in his Mantell and letherne girdle, wherewith he girded his loines: then Iohn Baptist did in Eatinge
of Locustes and wilde Honie, in wearinge a garmente of Camelles heare, and in girdinge him selfe
aboute the loines with a skinne.
But I praie you, Sirs, who be ye? if we woulde folowe your lightnes, haue we not like matter
of diuersitie in outwarde thinges, to twite you withall: but that your diuersitie is with breache of
due order, and Lawe, and that of religious men is accordinge to order, and rule? If ye thinke diuer∣sitie
in thinges of their owne Nature indifferent, as meates, apparell, shauinge, &c. woorthy to be
reprehended, and deduce from thence an argumente of mutuall dissension: amonge your ministringe
Cleregie is not likewise diuersitie founde? Do not some amonge you weare square Cappes, some
rounde Cappes, some butten Cappes, some onely Hattes? Doo not some weare side gownes hauinge
large sleeues, with Tippettes, whiche is not wel liked of your secte, some of more perfection Turkey
gownes, Gaberdeines, Frockes, or night gownes of the moste laye fashion for auoidinge of Supersti∣tion?
The thinge is indifferent, and maye be yelded vnto, saithe the one secte: They be the Popes
ragges, and maie not be worne, saith thother Secte. And therefore they will rather be iustly put
from that whiche iustely they cannot keepe, then yelde one iote. Neither her Maiesties commaunde∣ment,
nor their Metropolitans decree care they for. They had rather seeme to the people, whome
they vse for their Clawebackes, and to whose iudgement they stande or fall, stoute Champions of
their owne Gospell, then meeke folowers of Christes Gospell. Suche mighty Samsons, suche constant
Laurences, your ioyly Gospell breedeth.
Some saie, the Body of Christe in the Communion is torne and crusshed with Teethe, some denie it.
Yea forsothe, and bothe meane right well. The hundred and thirtene Bishoppes assembled in Coun∣cell
at Rome vnder Pope Nicolaus the seconde, prescribed suche forme of Recantation to Berenga∣rius
the firste Auctor of the Sacramentarie Heresie, openly there to pronounce, acknowledge, and with
subscription to ratifie, as he should confesse the very true Body of Christe, not onely the Sacramente
thereof, sensibly and in veritie to be handled with the handes of the Priestes, to be broken and
crusshed with Teethe of the Faithefull. By whiche woordes these Fathers minde was to expresse a
veritie of Reall Presence, a true Eatinge of Christes Body in deede, and to exclude the onely spiri∣tuall
eatinge, so as the olde Fathers did Eate Christe in their Manna. Neither is thus Doctrine disso∣nant