Bishop of Romes Custome was, to geue Iurisdiction to the Patriarkes of Alexan∣dria,
of Antioche, and of Hierusalem: and that thei had none Authoritie of Gouern∣mente,
but onely so mutche, as was limited, and allowed by him. And this, you
saye, was the onely, and vndoubted meaninge of that Councel. This fantasie is
not here auouched by any Auncient Doctour, or Learned Father. Therefore wée
muste thinke, what so euer it be, it is your owne. And weighinge the strangenesse
of the same, I muste needes saie of yow, as S. Hierome saide sometime of one Rhe∣ticius
in the like case, Rheticius eloquens quidem est, sed ineptus Interpres: Rheti∣cius
is an eloquente man in deede: and yet but a fonde Interpreter. For it is certaine, and
knowen euen vnto Children, that the Bishop of Rome, before the Councel of
Nice, had neither sutche Custome of Superioritie, nor sutche dealinge of Iurisdi∣ctions.
Pope Pius Secundus saithe, Ante Nicenam Synodum vnusquisque sibi vi∣xit:
& paruus respectus ad Romanā Ecclesiam halebatur: Before the Councel of Nice, e∣uery
Bishop liued to him selfe: and there was then smal regarde had to the Churche of Rome.
As for our sortishe Argumentes, sutche as by your iudgemente any sorte would
be ashamed to make, I maye leaue them wel to you, M. Hardinge; not for that ye
lacke them greately, but for that, as it appeare the by your Bookes, ye knowe beste
howe to vse them.
Touchinge the sixthe Canon of this Councel, whiche, you imagine, is so darke,
and doubteful, I truste, it shalbe plainely, and clearely opened, by them that were
neuer hitherto accounted sottishe.
The woordes thereof are plaine yenough. The sense is this. The whole
Body of Christendome was diuided into foure Patriarkshippes: wherof the First
was Rome: the Seconde Alexandria: the Thirde Antioche: the Fourthe Hierusa∣lem.
And eche of these was limited, and bounded within it selfe: Alexandria, to
haue the ouersight ouer Egypte, & Pentapolis: Antioche, ouer Syria: Hierusalem,
ouer Iurie: Rome, ouer Italie, and other Churches of the Weaste. And herein wée
haue the Exposition of Theodorus Balsamon, that liued fiue hundred yeeres agoe,
and was Patriarke of Antioche, and, as somme of M. Hardinges trendes haue
thought, a man of greate Learninge. Yet for as mutche as M. Hardinge here vt∣terly
refuseth him, not onely as a Schismatique, but also as a man bothe of Lear∣ninge,
and Reason, let vs therefore sée somme others.
Nilus, a Gréeke Authour, hereof writeth thus: Sed vt etiam liquidiùs appareat,
Papam non imperare alijs omnibus Episcopis, legatur Sextus Canon Synodi Nicenae: quo
Disertè praecipitur, vt alijs Ecclesijs alexandrinus, alijs Romanus, alijs Antiochenus
praesit: vt non liceat alteri alterius prouinciam inuadere: That it maie the more plainely ap∣peare,
that the Pope hathe no Gouernment ouer al other Bishoppes, reade the Six the Canon
of the Councel of Nice. There it is expressely Commaunded, that the Bishop of Alexandria
shal haue the rule ouer certaine Churches: and the Bishop of Rome ouer certaine: and the Bishop
of Antioche likewise ouer certaine: and that it be not lawful for any one of them to inuade an
others Iurisdiction. Farther he saithe, Quòd si quis suis non contentus, aliena appetit,
ille san•• meritò & Consuetudinis, & Sanctorum Canonum violator haberi debet:
Yf any one (of these Patriarkes) not contented with his owne, craue Dominion ouer others,
(as doothe the Pope) he ought of right to be called a breaker bothe of the Custome, and also
of the Holy Canons.
If M. Hardinge wil yet saie, this Exposition is sottishe, let vs sée, in what
sorte Others haue expounded the same. Rufinus openinge the same Canon saithe
thus: Statutum est in Concilio Niceno, vt apud Alexandriam, & in V••be Roma Vetusta
Cōsue••udo seruetur: vt vel ille Aegypti, vel hic Suburbicarum Ecclesiarum solicitudinem
gerat: It was decreed in the Councel of Nice, that in Alexandria, and in Rome the Olde
Custome should be kepte: that the Bishop of Alexandria should rule ouer Egypte: and the Bi∣shop