A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.

About this Item

Title
A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.
Author
Jewel, John, 1522-1571.
Publication
Imprinted at London :: In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Elephante, by Henry VVykes,
Anno 1567. 27. Octobris.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Jewel, John, 1522-1571. -- Apologia Ecclesiæ Anglicanæ -- Early works to 1800.
Harding, Thomas, 1516-1572. -- Confutation of a booke intituled An apologie of the Church of England -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Doctrines -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04468.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04468.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.

Pages

M. Hardinge.

VVhy speake ye not plainely?* 1.1 Be there no moe but twoo Sacramentes? Though ye saie not so expressely, yet wee iudge, that so ye meane. For so your scholefelowe of Geneua Theodore Beza pro∣nounceth in plaine termes in the Confession of your Geneuian Faithe. And so your selues, Defenders, do affirme in the Articles, which ye agreed vpon in your Conuocation holden at London in the yere of our Lorde. 1562. VVhiche Articles ye haue put forthe 〈◊〉〈◊〉 printe by the Queenes Auctoritie, as ye

Page 211

pretende. Nowe whereas ye acknowledge there be but twoo Sacramentes, why should any man be∣leeue you,* 1.2 rather then the Germaines your firste Scholemaisters, who* 1.3 in their Confession exhibited to Charles the fifthe then Emperour at Augspurge in the name of al the Protestantes, Anno. 1530. appointe three Sacramentes, Baptisme, the Euchariste, and Penance? The nexte yere after,‡ 1.4 Philip Melanchthon in his Apologie auouched those three Sacramentes: but afterwarde in the yere. 1552. he founde out an other, and made vp the number of foure, by addinge the Sacramente of Order to the foresaide three. In Lipsia they receiue three: In VVittenberg, whiche Citie is not thence far of, they haue foure. At Magdeburg thereby also Flacius Illyricus, and so many as folowe him, will haue but two: and the Zwenckfeldians, that spring out of the same stocke, care for none at al.

Forasmuche as ye alleage the names of the Olde Fathers for you, specially S. Ambrose,* 1.5 and S. Augustine, that there be but twoo Sacramentes, let vs see howe muche they make for maintenance of yo•••• Doctrine, and wheather they teache vs not, that there be moe S. Augustine in his seconde Bookes ••••ira literas Petiliani, speakinge of the place of the Psalme, Sicut vnguentum in capite, whiche the Heretike had alleaged, saithe thus: In hoc vnguento, &c. In this oinctement his will is to interpret the Sacramente of Chrisme (he meaneth the Sacramente of Confirmation) whiche in the kinde of visible signes is Holy, as Baptisme is. Lo, S. Augustine calleth cofirmation a Sacramente. S. Eusebius Pope namethe it a Sacramente in his third epistle written to al the Bishoppes of Tuscia and Campania: Manus impositionis Sacramentum, &c. The Sacramente of imposition of Handes (saithe he) is to be kepte with greate reuerence, whiche cannot be performed but by the high Priestes, (he vnderstandeth Bishoppes). Melchiades nexte to Syluester before the Nicene Coun∣cel speakinge muche of Confirmation, amonge other thinges saithe thus. Duo haec Sacramenta, Baptismi,* 1.6 & confirmationis, separanda non sunt: These twoo Sacramentes of Baptisme, and Confirmation, maye not be sundered. Though these twoo Bishoppes were Popes, yet they deserue credit, forasmuche as they liued before that corruption crept into the Churche, after your accoumpte, and died Holy Martyrs.

That Penaunce is a Sacramente,* 1.7 and so accoumpted amonge the Fathers, it is so euident, that who doubteth of it, maie seeme not to haue perused their writinges. S. Augustine in enchiridio ad Laurentium speakinge of Baptisme and Penaunce, calleth bothe, Salutaria Sacramenta, healthful Sacramentes. S. Ambrose signifieth him selfe to be of the same minde, in his firste Booke de Poentientia, Cap. 6. &. 7. and in the second Booke, Cap. 2. though without puttinge thexpresse name of Sacra∣mente. But in the third Chapter of that Booke he putteth the name of Sacramente expressely.

Touchinge Order,* 1.8 that is a Sacramente, also by verdite of S. Augustine, whom ye alleage for you. Let vs heare what he saithe. In his seconde Booke contra epist. Parmentani Cap. 13. these be his wordes, where he speaketh of Baptisme, and of the Power to Baptize, whiche is geuen in the Sacra∣mente of Order: Vtrunque euim Sacramentum est, & quadam consecratione vtiunque ho∣mini datur, illud cum Baptizatur, istud cum ordinatur. Ideo in Catholica non licet v∣trunque iterari: Either of them is a Sacramente, and with a certaine Consecration either is geuen to man: the one when he is Baptized, the other when he taketh Orders. Therefore in the Ca∣tholike Churche it is not lawful either of them to be taken twise.

For the Sacramente of wedlocke, besides other good and sufficient proufes, that it is a Sacra∣mente, wee haue sundrie testimonies out of S. Augustine,* 1.9 and other Doctours. In the Churche (saithe S. Augustine) not onely the bande of mariage, but also the Sacramente is so commended, that it is not lauful for the husbande to deliuer his VVife to another. He calleth wedlocke a Sacramente in many places of his workes. De bono coniugali. Cap. 7. 18. and in the. 24. Chapter of that Booke hee saithe: Haec omnia bona sunt, propter quae nuptiae bonae sunt, Proles, Fides, Sacramentū: All these thinges be good, for whiche mariage is good, issue, Faithe, the Sacramente.

Of extreme Vnction,* 1.10 who doubteth whether it be a Sacramente, let him reade the Epistle of Innocentrus the Firste ad Decentium Eugubinum Episcopum, Cap. 8. where moste planely trea∣tinge of it, he nameth it a Sacramente. Chrysostome interpreteth the place of S. Iames epistle for this Sacramente. And so dothe Bede, alleaging the place of S. Iames, the sixth of Marke, the Auctoritie of Innocentius, and the custome of the Churche. Seinge then we haue founde the* 1.11 seuen sacramentes

Page 212

expressely mentioned in the Fathers,* 1.12 accordinge to the teaching of the Catholique Churche: whereas ye teache men to beleeue there be but two, and pretend that the Fathers spake of nomo:* 1.13 I truste from henceforthe they wil take better aduise, how they beleue your bare VVoorde without al prouse, and with certaine danger of their soules, forsake the Doctrine of the Churche, whiche is the sure Pillour,* 1.14 and ground of truthe, as S. Paule saithe. In this greate pointe, Beza, and ye of that side bee manifestly founde lyers.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.