A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.

About this Item

Title
A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.
Author
Jewel, John, 1522-1571.
Publication
Imprinted at London :: In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Elephante, by Henry VVykes,
Anno 1567. 27. Octobris.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Jewel, John, 1522-1571. -- Apologia Ecclesiæ Anglicanæ -- Early works to 1800.
Harding, Thomas, 1516-1572. -- Confutation of a booke intituled An apologie of the Church of England -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Doctrines -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04468.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04468.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.

Pages

Page 729

The B. of Sarisburie.

Christe neuer tolde vs, neither of any his Vicare General: nor of Rome: nor of Laterane: nor of Peters Chaire: nor willed vs to haue recourse to the Bishop of Rome, more then to any other seueral Bishop. Therefore, M. Harding, we muste recken this emongest the reste of your Vntruthes.

It is true, that you saie, A member diuided from the Body cannot liue. But youre Conclusion is Vntrue, like the rest. For, Rome is not the Body, but onely a Mem∣ber of the Body: Rome is not the Tree, but onely a Boughe: Rome is not the Heade, but onely a Springe. And therefore, seeinge, it is nowe diuided from that Body: seeinge, it is broken from that Tree: seeing, it is cut of from that Heade, it is no maruaile, thoughe it be sterued, thoughe it be wethered, thoughe it be leafte drie, without either Sprite, or life: As this daie it appeareth to the eies of al them, that wil beholde it.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.