A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.

About this Item

Title
A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.
Author
Jewel, John, 1522-1571.
Publication
Imprinted at London :: In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Elephante, by Henry VVykes,
Anno 1567. 27. Octobris.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Jewel, John, 1522-1571. -- Apologia Ecclesiæ Anglicanæ -- Early works to 1800.
Harding, Thomas, 1516-1572. -- Confutation of a booke intituled An apologie of the Church of England -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Doctrines -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04468.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04468.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 16, 2024.

Pages

The B. of Sarisburie.

Al this mater is fully answeared by VVhat, and by VVhat. VVhat mater of Faithe? VVhat manners? VVhat disorder? VVhat defectes? VVhat Abuses? But al these vvhattes notwithstanding, vvhat if your Pope, your Cardinalles, and your Cleregie, with the whole disorder of your Romaine Churche, with so many Priestes keepinge Concubines, with so many Non Residentes, with so many Doumbe Bishoppes, and with so many thousandes of common Harlottes, be in case now, euen as they were before? Wil yée telle vs neuerthelesse, that al your soares be sufficiently salued? Or, muste wée beleue, that your keepinge of Concu∣bines, your open Stewes, and Fornications &c. be no soares? Verily, S. Bernarde saithe,* 1.1 as it is alleged before, Intestina, & insanabilis est plaga Ecclesiae: The wounde of the Churche bleedeth inwardely, and is past cure: And againe, A planta pe∣dis, vs{que} ad verticem Capitis non est in ea sanitas: There is no whole parte in the Churche from the sole of the foote, to the toppe of the Heade. Baptista Mantuanus saith, Aegrotatqúe Fides iam proxima morti: The Faithe of the Romaine Churche is sicke, and almoste deade.

In your Olde Latine Translation of the Bible, there be sundrie errours, so o∣pen, and so grosse, that a very Babe maie soone espie them: as it maie more plaine∣ly appeare by Budaeus, Erasmus, Valla, Faber, Lindanus, and others. Yet, that notwithstandinge, your Councel saithe precisely thus, Ne quis Veterem vulgaram Editionem reijcere quouis praetextu audeat, vel praesumat: Lette no man dare, or presume by any manner of coloure, to refuse the Olde Common Transla∣tion of the Bible: As if your Councelles were yourposely summoned, to main∣teine errours. If yee wil so wilfully deceiue vs in sensible maters, how maie wée then truste you in maters of Faithe?

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.