A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.

About this Item

Title
A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.
Author
Jewel, John, 1522-1571.
Publication
Imprinted at London :: In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Elephante, by Henry VVykes,
Anno 1567. 27. Octobris.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Jewel, John, 1522-1571. -- Apologia Ecclesiæ Anglicanæ -- Early works to 1800.
Harding, Thomas, 1516-1572. -- Confutation of a booke intituled An apologie of the Church of England -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Doctrines -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04468.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04468.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.

Pages

M. Hardinge.

If a man shoulde aske you, where that woorde of God is, that maketh a temporall Prince Su∣preme head of that parte of the Churche, which he hath gournement of in al ciuil matters, I am sure you can bringe foorthe* 1.1 no other woorde of God. then that, wherein S. Peter,* 1.2 and S. Paule willeth al menne to obeie the Superiour powers, especially Kinges. VVhiche thinge was written to all Christian men, whiles they liued vnder Heathen Princes, and Infidels, as Claudius Cesar, and Nero were, whom, I suppose, ye wil not saie to haue benne heades of the whole Churche, as they were Monarkes and

Page 643

Princes of the whole worlde.* 1.3 If then by those Scriptures whiche cannot proue Nero (beinge a* 1.4 perse∣cutour of Christes Churche) to haue ben heade of the same, you wil now proue, that other Princes are supreme heads of the Churche: it semeth that either you make Nero heade of the Churche with them, or geue more vnto them, then the word of God wil beare. And as for examples of good cōmon weales, shewe vs but one since Christes ascension, wherein before Luthers time, any Emperour Christian, or other Prince did attribute that title vnto him selfe: and we wil saie, that, when you speake of com∣mon weales in the plural number, you make but one lye: but in case you shew vs no one common weale that hath so done, then you lie in the plural number. Yea further, if at this daie the common weales in Christendome, not onely that are Catholike, but the beste also of those, that are Lutherishe, and newfan∣gled, do abhorre frō that strange, and vnheard title of‡ 1.5 supreme head of the Churche, why do you saie, that ye haue, either worde of God for it, or example of approued common weales?

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.