A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.

About this Item

Title
A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.
Author
Jewel, John, 1522-1571.
Publication
Imprinted at London :: In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Elephante, by Henry VVykes,
Anno 1567. 27. Octobris.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Jewel, John, 1522-1571. -- Apologia Ecclesiæ Anglicanæ -- Early works to 1800.
Harding, Thomas, 1516-1572. -- Confutation of a booke intituled An apologie of the Church of England -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Doctrines -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04468.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04468.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.

Pages

The Apologie, Cap. 10. Diuision. 1.

Surely, to haue the principal staie, and effecte of al maters com∣mitted wholy to these mennes handes, who neither knowe, nor wil knowe these thinges, nor yet set a iote by any poincte of Religion, saue that, whiche concerneth their belly, and riot, and to haue them alone sitte as Iudges, and to be set vp as ouerseers in the Watche tower, being no better then Blinde Spies: of the other side, to haue a christian Prince of good vnderstandinge, & of a right iudgemente, to stande stil like a blocke, or a stake, not to be suffred, neither to geeue his voice, nor to shewe his iudgemente, but onely to waite, what these menne shal wil, and commaunde, as one, whiche had neither eares, nor eies, nor witte, nor harte, and, whatsoeuer they geeue in charge, to allowe it without exception, blindely fulfilling their Com∣maundementes, be they neuer so blasphemous, and wicked, yea, al∣though they commaunde him quite to destroie al Religion, and to Crucifie againe Christe him selfe, This surely, bisides that it is proude, and spiteful, is also beyonde al right, and reason, and not to be endured of Christian, & wise Princes. For why, I praie you, maie Caiphas, & Annas vnderstande these maters, and maie not Dauid, and Ezechias doo the same? Is it lauful for a Cardinal, beinge a man of warre, and delitinge in Bloude, to haue place in a Councel: and is it not lauful for a Christian Emperoure, or a Kinge?

The B. of Sarisburie.

Hereto M. Hardinge saithe nothinge, but that he hath oftentimes saide before.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.