A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.

About this Item

Title
A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.
Author
Jewel, John, 1522-1571.
Publication
Imprinted at London :: In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Elephante, by Henry VVykes,
Anno 1567. 27. Octobris.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Jewel, John, 1522-1571. -- Apologia Ecclesiæ Anglicanæ -- Early works to 1800.
Harding, Thomas, 1516-1572. -- Confutation of a booke intituled An apologie of the Church of England -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Doctrines -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04468.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04468.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.

Pages

The Apologie, Cap. 1. Diuision. 1.

BVt peraduenture they wil saie, it was trea∣son, to attempt these maters without a sacred General Councel: For that therein consi∣steth the whole force of the Churche: there Christe hath promised, he wil euer be a pre∣sente assistant. Yet they themselues, without tarrienge for any General Councel, haue broken the Commaundementes of God, and the Decrees of the Apostles: and, as wee said a little aboue, they haue spoiled, and disanulled almoste al, not onely the Ordinaunces, but euen the Doctrine of the Primitiue Churche. And, where they saie, It is not lawful, to make a chaunge without a Councel, what was he, that gaue vs these Lawes, or, from whence had they this Iniunction?

M. Hardinge.

If general Councels continewe in that estimation, and Auctoritie they haue euer had, theire pri∣uate conspiracies, and false conueiances in corners be like to be dasshed. Nowe priketh foorth theire Secretary, who thinketh him self a fresh souldier in Rhetorike, and geueth the onsette vpon vs, with a blinde peraduenture. But Sir, what so euer you imagine vs to saie, touchinge a General Councel, we are not so simple as to graunt (whiche your Peraduenture semeth to surmise of vs) that your Heretical, and moste vngodly matters, whiche you speake of, might without blame be attempted by licence of any Councel. Sutche wicked changes in religion, as ye haue made, neither is it lawful to make with a Councel, nor without a Councel.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.