M. Hardinge.
To that ye pretende to allege out of Epiphanius, we saie, first, that although he were of the minde you make him to be of,* 1.1 and saide, as you reporte of him, yet is he but one man, whose singular opinion is not to be preferred before the‡ 1.2 Iudgemēt of al other so many excellent Fathers, and the determination of the whole Churche.* 1.3 Nowe in deede you misreporte Epiphanius. For he saithe not so, as your write. He calleth not the hauing of the Image of Christe, of any Saincte in the Churche an horrible wic∣kednesse, or a sinne not to be suffered: he hath no sutch wordes.
Secondly, what if we saie, this place maketh nothinge at al againste the vse of Images, and that ‡ 1.4 he speaketh neuer a woorde againste the Image of Christe, or his Sainctes in the Churche, but onely againste one particular Image, whiche he founde hanginge at a Churche dore in a village of Pale∣stine called Anablatha? And seing he* 1.5 speaketh not generally againste al Images, but against sutche as that was, which there he noteth by this special word, Istiusmodi Vela, vailes of this sorte: he ge∣ueth vs to vnderstande that he misliked some qualitie or circumstance of that one Image, and not re∣proued the‡ 1.6 common and receiued custome of the Churche in hauing Images in due order. Now, what circumstance that was, it dependeth of so many particularities. whiche might happen either on the Images parte, as it is moste like, or on the peoples parte there inhabitant, and is so litle declared by Epi∣phanius in that place, that neither we can saie any thinge determinately thereof, nor ye should bring sutche an obscure, and vncertaine matter to the disproufe of a veritie alwaies so wel in the Churche acknowledged and practised.