A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.

About this Item

Title
A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.
Author
Jewel, John, 1522-1571.
Publication
Imprinted at London :: In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Elephante, by Henry VVykes,
Anno 1567. 27. Octobris.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Jewel, John, 1522-1571. -- Apologia Ecclesiæ Anglicanæ -- Early works to 1800.
Harding, Thomas, 1516-1572. -- Confutation of a booke intituled An apologie of the Church of England -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Doctrines -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04468.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04468.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 7, 2024.

Pages

M. Hardinge.

A man would haue thought, you woulde haue brought some substantiall Argumente, whereby to prooue, that the Churche erreth. Neither make you excuse in that, you speake of the Romaine Churche.* 1.1 In this accompte wee make no difference betwene the Romaine Churche, and the Churche. But all your proufes depende vpon your iffes, whiche beinge denied, you haue nomore to saie. No doubte (saie you) if that Churche maie erre, whiche hath departed from Goddes VVoorde, from Christes Commaundementes, &c. then it hath erred in very deede. But Syr, what if a man denie your supposal, and staie you in your firste if? VVhat haue you to prooue it? All that you haue saide hitherto. We knowe, and of litle force it is. But no doubte, saie you, if that Churche maie erre, which hath departed from Goddes VVoorde, &c. Yea forsoothe, if all iffes were true, then if Hea∣uen fell, wee shoulde catche Larkes. And if a bridge were made betwene Douer and Calys, wee mighte goe to Boleine a foote, as VVilliam Somer once tolde Kinge Henry, if it be true, that I haue hearde saie.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.