A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.

About this Item

Title
A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie.
Author
Jewel, John, 1522-1571.
Publication
Imprinted at London :: In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Elephante, by Henry VVykes,
Anno 1567. 27. Octobris.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Jewel, John, 1522-1571. -- Apologia Ecclesiæ Anglicanæ -- Early works to 1800.
Harding, Thomas, 1516-1572. -- Confutation of a booke intituled An apologie of the Church of England -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Apologetic works -- Early works to 1800.
Church of England -- Doctrines -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04468.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A defence of the Apologie of the Churche of Englande conteininge an answeare to a certaine booke lately set foorthe by M. Hardinge, and entituled, A confutation of &c. By Iohn Iewel Bishop of Sarisburie." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A04468.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.

Pages

M. Hardinge.

The Doctrine of obedience apperteineth specially to subiectes. The Bishop of Rome sittinge by due succession in the chaire of Peter,* 1.1 in spiritual causes can haue no Superiour. In temporal mat∣ters it maie be, that in one age he hath acknowledged the Emperoure, as the Lorde of that prouince, where he liued.‡ 1.2 as before Constantine al the Popes did liue in subiection: and in an other age he maie be Lorde thereof him selfe. Likewise S. Gregorie might cal Mauritius his Lorde, either of cour∣tesie, or of custome: and yet our Holy Father Pius the fourth shal not be bounde to do the like, in* 1.3 con∣sideration that the custome hath longe sence ben discontinewed. Neither did S. Gregorie by that title of honour preiudicate vnto him selfe in any spiritual iurisdiction. For that name notwithstandinge, he gouerned the‡ 1.4 whole Churche, and complained that Maximus was made Bishop of Salonae a Cittie in Illyrico, without his Auctoritie, not regarding that Mauritius the Emperoure was thought to haue willed it so to be donne.* 1.5 And therefore he writeth to Constantia the Empresse, that for as mutche as neither he, nor his depute was made priuie to it, that the thinge had benne donne, whiche neuer was donne before by any of the Princes, that were the Emperours Predecessours.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.