But Sabellicus the Authoure him selfe saith. It is writtē in the nienth Enneade.
I wil not saie, as you saie, There be tvvoo Lies. Againe you saie, It is in the
Firste Booke: But Sabellicus him selfe saithe, It is in the Seuenthe Booke. Yet
wil not I folowe you, nor saie, There be three Lies. For a surplussage, and
more likelihoode of your tale, ye note also the yeere of our Lorde 1220. with as good
discretion, as the reste. For at that time, neither Pope Clemens, nor Francise
Dandalus was yet borne. For this thinge happened, as it moste plainely
appeareth by al stories, aboute the yéere of our Lorde 1310. Al this notwithstan∣dinge,
I wil not hunte so gréedily for aduantages, nor saie, as you saie, There is
the Foruthe Lie. Neither wil I saie, as you saie, not withstandinge somme man
perhaps might happen to saie it, M. Hardinge the Defender hereof, is either an
Vnhoneste man, or paste shame, or a Lier, or a foole.
These woordes of yours, M. Hardinge, are neither mannerly, nor manly: not∣withstandinge
they séeme wel to contente your pleasante humoure. S. Hierome
saithe, Non aequè inimici audiunt, & amici. Qui inimicus est, etiam in scirpo nodum
quaerit: An Enimie, and a Frende heare not bothe of one sorte. An Enimie wil (cauil, and
quarrel, and) seeke a knotte in a russhe. The Substance of Goddes Religion stan∣deth
not in the reportinge of a storie. S. Hierome saithe of sutche Captious
quarrellers: Audiant à me, non periclitari Ecclesiarum statum, si ego celeritate dictandi
verba aliqua dimiserim: Let them vnderstande, that al be it I in haste of penninge haue let
escape a woorde, or twoo, yet that shal not hazarde the state of the Churche of God.
But Francise Dandalus, ye saie, was not at that time Duke of Venice: He him selfe
tied the chaine aboute his owne necke: He came of his owne accorde vpon al foure, as if he had benne
a Dogge, and laie downe willingly vnder the Popes Table: He laie not there to gnawe boanes: He
founde no Dogge there to lie with him. Therefore, ye saie, this Defender is an Vnho∣neste
man, paste al shame, a Lier, and a foole. Sutche Cholerique Conclusions,
M. Hardinge, maie wel beseeme a Doctoure of your Diuinitie.
Howe be it, the faireste coloure, ye can laie vpon the matter, is this, That the
Embassadoure of that Noble Common VVeale of Venice, laie as a Dogge, in
a chaine, vnderneathe the Popes Table, as you saie, and that, vvillingly, and
vvith al his harte, by sutche Submission to appease the Popes ••ighe indignation,
and to recouer his fauoure towardes his Countrie. It séemeth, he was either a
very Arrogante man, or a marueilous angrie Pope, that woulde by none other
Submission be reconciled.
But Dandalus at that time was not Duke. Neither was it so harde a ma∣ter
to knowe that, M. Hardinge: nor was it so greate an Heresie to cal him Duke,
for that shortely after he was made Duke. S. Augustine saithe, Dicimus, Aposto∣lum
Paulum in Tharso Ciliciae natum. At ille tunc iam non erat Apostolus. Ita
cùm audimus, Discipulos Christi inuitatos ad nuptias, non iam Discipulos, sed qui
futuri erant Discipuli, intelligere debemus: Wee saie, that Paule the Apostle was borne at
Tharsus in Cilicia. And yet Paule at that time, when he was borne, was no Apostle. Euen
so, when wee heare, that Christes Disciples were bidden to the Mariage Feaste at Cana in
Galilee, wee muste vnderstande, that they were not then his Disciples, but became after∣warde
his Disciples.
So S. Hierome calleth Pamphilus a Martyr: and yet at that time, whereof
he meante, Pamphilus in deede was no Martyr. Therefore he saith, Conceda∣mus,
vt Pamphili sit, sed nondum Martyris. Antè enim scripsit, quàm Marty∣rium
perpeteretur: Let vs graunte, it was Pamphilus Booke: but that Pamphilus as yet
was no Martyr. For he wrote his Booke firste, and was Martyr afterwarde. Likewise a∣gaine
he saithe, Nos pro, No, Alexandriam posuimus per Anticipationem, quae
Graecè 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 appellatur: Wee in steede of the Cittie, No, haue translated it, the Cittie