Page 61
The Answere.
I now see it verified of Lutherans and Protestants, & of all other writers, m 1.1 which Vopiscus obserued of Historians, nullum non Historicorum mentitum, that the best historians by trusting other writers or repor∣tets, may deliuer an n 1.2 vntruth now and then. Os••ander was a good Historian, but hee neuer read VVickliffes works; or if he had seene some of them, he saw not all. For in his Latin Exposition vpon the o 1.3 third commande∣ment, and his p 1.4 booke of the Truth of the Scripture, he doth plainly shew the contrary••, condemning only al Equiuocall, amphibological, q 1.5 mixt, & wandring pro∣positions, whether with oath, or without oath, willing men not for a r 1.6 world of world••, or for the s 1.7 saluation of infinite soules to lie, that is to equiuocate (as he inter∣preteth it) much lesse to sweare an vntruth, that is to fortweare. His treatise againstt 1.8 Equivocatiō, is a most profound, learned, and iudicious worke; and worthy to be put in print, if it were an entire discourse of it selfe, where u 1.9 Parsons may see, that hee hath not so much as a smal starting hole left, to put his head in vnsought or vnstopt.