A modest reply to certaine answeres, which Mr. Gataker B.D. in his treatise of the nature, & vse of lotts, giveth to arguments in a dialogue concerning the vnlawfulnes of games consisting in chance And aunsweres to his reasons allowing lusorious lotts, as not evill in themselves. By Iames Balmford, minister of Iesus Christ.

About this Item

Title
A modest reply to certaine answeres, which Mr. Gataker B.D. in his treatise of the nature, & vse of lotts, giveth to arguments in a dialogue concerning the vnlawfulnes of games consisting in chance And aunsweres to his reasons allowing lusorious lotts, as not evill in themselves. By Iames Balmford, minister of Iesus Christ.
Author
Balmford, James, b. 1556.
Publication
[London] :: Imprinted [by William Jaggard for E. Boyle?],
1623.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Gataker, Thomas, 1574-1654. -- Of the nature and use of lots.
Gambling -- Religious aspects -- Christianity -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A03243.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A modest reply to certaine answeres, which Mr. Gataker B.D. in his treatise of the nature, & vse of lotts, giveth to arguments in a dialogue concerning the vnlawfulnes of games consisting in chance And aunsweres to his reasons allowing lusorious lotts, as not evill in themselves. By Iames Balmford, minister of Iesus Christ." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A03243.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed October 31, 2024.

Pages

Page 26

* 1.1 To the Christian Reader being none of those men▪ who, (accor∣ding to S. Paul's prophecy,) love pleasures more than God.

* 1.2 SOme yeares are past since Mr. Gataker tooke occasion, from casting of Lotts to finde out for whose sake a daun∣gerous storme was, to justisie play∣ing with Dice, Cards, &c. and to confute me by name in open pul∣pit. I hearing thereof by many, sent him this message. If it would please him to send the substance of the Confutation (for I dare not re∣ly vpon report) I would either re∣ply, or chaunge mine opinion

Page 27

with thankes to God for him; though for the present, I thought he failed in Indgment, Discretion, and Charity. In Iudgment. Be∣cause that Doctrine was not draw∣ne from his Text; Except this be a judicious deduction. Gentiles cast Lotts in a most serious matter, the∣refore Christians may vse Lottery in dicing, carding, &c. In Discre∣tion. Because that Doctrine (though occasioned by his text, yet) so insisted vpon, incourageth gamesters in their sinfull course and buildeth vp those abuses, which the Lawes of our Land, would pull downe. In Charity; Because he con∣futeth me by name, (as I was cer∣tified) not having had any confe∣rence with me either by speech, or by writing, though I be his neigh∣bour Minister. Well; Mr. Gataker, sent me his answere to my dialogue. I acknowledge it with hearty than∣kes.

Page 28

But why have I not replyed in so many yeares? I answere, Sa••••itò, si sat benè. To speake freely I thinke, I should never have re∣plied, in hope that the question would have died, had not Mr. Gata∣ker confuted my Dialogue in print▪ But now, the rather, being provo∣ked▪ by many learned Ministers & other, who tell me, that, seeing of all those whom Mr. Gataker confu∣teth, viz: Peter Martyr, Zuinglius, Cart∣wright,* 1.3 Danoeus, Perkins, Fenner, &c. I onely live, I ought to reply, least my silence should give way to im∣piousiniquity, I am ready to per∣forme my promise in replying. Which (indeed) I could not have done so conveniently before, be∣cause the answer, which Mr. Gata∣ker sent me, had not the positiue groundes of his opinion, which the printed booke hath.

Before I proceed▪ I protest be∣fore

Page 26

God, that I esteeme Mr. Ga∣aker as a learned, painfull, and faithfull Minister, and a right honest man, and therefore pray thee (Christian Reader) that what∣soever I write may be conside∣red as concerning the question betweene vs, and not in any wise applied to the least praejudice of so reverend a brother, or to any of his excellent parts; So excellent, that I wonder what mooved him to publish his opi∣nion in print, and the more, be∣cause of many passages in his booke. First, He taketh know∣ledge* 1.4 of many enormous crimes, which accompany Dice, Cardes, &c. pa. 193. & in the quotations. Se∣condly;* 1.5 He giveth this rule, That, that, which is no necessary duety, but a thing indifferēt onely, other∣wise, may not be done, where is strōg presumptiō vpō good ground

Page 30

yet it shall spiritually endanger a mans selfe, or others, by giving oc∣casion of sinne vnto the one, or the other. pag. 107. 108. 109.

If many and greivous sinnes at∣tend dice, cardes, &c. If those ga∣mes be too too commonly abused, as he confesseth. pa: 194. and if an indifferent thing may not be done which giveth occasion of sinne, I wonder why Mr. Gataker writeth in defence of dice, &c. and the more, because he graunteth, that, where the vse, and abuse of a thing are so inwrapped, and intangled to∣gither, that they cannot easily be severed the one from the other, then the vse of the thing it selfe, (if it be vnnecessary otherwise) would be wholely abandoned, pag. 262. 263. Thirdly; He sheweth in many pages▪ how severely tables, but es∣pecially dice, be condemned by Lawes, Civill, Canonicall, and Muni∣cipall,

Page 31

that is, our English statutes, as e sheweth at large, Lib. 8. § 5. 8. He wisheth the Lawes were yet ore severe, & putt in better exe∣ution, pà. 206. He saith, yet our ommon dicers may be marshalled mong ye flock, of ye Devill's fol∣owers, pa. 217. He affirmeth most ifelings, and Lotteries to be little etter than vnlawfull games, pag. 20. And he teacheth, that, by heis games, we must not give of∣ence to the Lawes vnder which ee live, pa. 251. Now I wonder, hat so good a man is not affraid to offend our Law by allowing for∣idden games, even Dice, as well s Cardes, &c. which consist not onely of Lottery. Here I have oc∣casion to thinke, that I may have ome more comfort in mine opi∣nion, than Mr. Gataker can have in is; For he nameth famous, lear∣ned, and godly men concurring

Page 32

with me in opinion: But in t multitude o his quotations, I find none approoving Dice in play, an whereas some learned Divines, i some sort, allow games consistin of Lott, and itt, but altogethe condemne D••••e, Mr. Gataker defe∣deth mine opinion, disapproovin a mixt▪ as well as a mere Lott, b∣cause (as he saith) a true Lott is i either, pa. 126. and, He deemet them to be amisse, who allow Lott in game, and yet adde for a cautio that Religionsnesse be vsed in th action, in regard that Holy thing must be done in an holy manne* 1.6 pa. 133. Fourthly, He graunteth tha Prayer specially applied to th Lott may be conceived, where th matter is more weighty, and th event of some consequence, pa. 1 And yet he holdeth, that the less weighty the matter is, wherein Lott is vsed, the lawfuller the Lott

Page 33

is, pag. 111. The reason, why I won∣der at this passage, shall be given in my Reply. The last passage now to be observed as matter of my wondering, is this; Notwithstan∣ding, he confidently affirmeth that we may not doe ought without warrant, pag. 301. Sufficiently con∣firmeth the same, because such an Act is not done of Faith, and there∣fore not free from sinne, Rom. 14. 23. but is a mere presumption, and tempting of God, pag. 313. and quot. A▪ and B. and Earnestly re∣prooveth one kinde of Lottery (why not all, against which the same reason is of like validity?) because not found revealed in any word of God, but brought in either by Sathan, or by some of his instru∣ments who are addicted to Vanity, pag. 315. and 316. and, yet he avoucheth, That it is a sufficient warrant for the vse of Lottes,

Page 34

In that the oppugners, being lear∣ned, can say nothing against them▪ but what hath beene, or may be sufficiently answered, pag. 235.

May I not wonder that so judi∣cious a scholler doth not observe this discrepance? Lottery is vnlaw∣full, if not warranted by the word which positiō supposeth the Wor to be perfect, as is the Authou thereof, and 2. Lottery is lawful if Learned men can say nothing ou of the Word against it. Which po∣sition supposeth two things, viz That the Word is like the Lawes o men, that is, Imperfect, as be the Au∣thours therof; and, That Learne men cannot so faile in Diligence o reading, Clearenesse of vnderstan∣ding, and Firmenesse of Memory but that▪ if there were in the Wor anything against Lottery, the could nor but see it. Well; It ma be seene shortly, how Mr. Gataker Dili∣gence,

Page 35

Vnderstanding, and Memo∣ry have served him in defenoing Lusorious Lotts. In the meane while, Sufficiency of his answering is but vpon the Triall, and not yet adjudged.

All theis passages well reveiwed by Mr. Gataker I should thinke he cannot wonder that a man of 64. yeares compleate, (and therefore his wittes may faile) doth wonder that so godly, wise, and learned a man, the faculties of whose minde are at the best, did not say to him∣selfe, before he preached, much more before he penned this luso∣rious doctrine, Let Baal plead for* 1.7 himselfe; and, Theis gamesters shall, without any encouragment from me, draw on their iniquity ith theis cordes of vanity; and the rather, because he acknowledgeth that accoumpt is to be given vnto God of gaming pa. 261. If of the act

Page 36

much more of justifying it. Fro m which account good Lord deliver me. For I feare, that in iustifying lusorious Lottes, I should put false spectacles on a gamester's nose, whereby the bridge seemeth broa∣der, than it is, and so he falleth in without feare, to vse Mr. Gataker si∣militude, pag. 264. But Mr. Gataker beleveth, that he hath written the truth, (Preface to the Reader) and is confident that truth is to be knowne, especially concerning matters of common practise, pag. 263. and giveth foure reasons, by which he was mooved to defend* 1.8 lusorious Lottes, pag. 264. The first is, To draw men from Superstition in restraining themselves, when God doth not restraine them. This beggeth the question, (as I hope) will appeare in the Reply.* 1.9 A 2. motive is, Because arguments against lusorious Lottes have made

Page 37

many stagger in the necessary vse of serious civill Lottes. It may be so some failing in their judgment: But it may be also, that many moe will be made to stagger by reading Mr. Gatakers exceptions against ar∣guments for, and cautions, in those serious Civill Lottes, Cap. 5. and by his Maxime, [The lesse weighty the matter is, wherein a Lott is vsed, the lawfuller the Lott is, pag. 111.] A 3. motive is, To take away* 1.10 much heart-burning; Nay, ra∣ther this justifying Lusorious Lottes will not onely cause more heart-burning; but incourage also gamesters to overcrow such, as are scrupulous. For, if many well af∣fected have beene constrained, in regard of scruple, in this kinde, to straine themselves to some inconveniences by refusall of those games, when by those, whom they had dependance vpon,

Page 38

vpon or familiarity withall, they have beene vrged occasionally therevnto (which to prevent here∣after, is a 4. cause of his writing) How will those supporters, and fa∣miliars insult vpon the scrupulous▪ now they have so learned a Pa∣trone of their gaming? Some have strained themselves, to some in∣conveniences for not pledging drunken Healths, being drinke offe∣rings to Bacchus. To prevent which hereafter, should Mr. Gata∣ker doe well, vnto aedification, to preach, and write in Iustification of these Healths? The summe of his causes (as he expresseth himselfe in his preface to the Reader) is, To sett at Liberty the intangled consciences of Godly disposed persons. Indeed; If any conscien∣ce, simply for playing with Lottes, should seeke his his satisfaction in private, then if Mr. Gataker quie∣ted

Page 39

him by his grounds (supposed true) it were not amisse. But is eve∣ry doctrine, though true, to be in∣sisted vpon both by preaching, and printing, and that affirming matter in question, and of no necessary vse? I say, Affirming, remembring the holy wisedome of the Apostles, and Elders, who decreed touching offensive things (yet some of them lawfull, if conveniently vsed) onely negatively, and deemeth it not ne∣cessary* 1.11 to decree affirmatively things that were then, and might be in vse for a time. Many (I feare too many) learned Divines approo∣ve Vsury in their Iudgment, thouh condemned by Law. Yet none, that I know, ever insisted vpon the Iustification thereof by preaching and printing. Againe; Was there ever any so troubled with playing with Lotts? I doubt it; But without doubt thousandes will now more

Page 40

boldly vse lusorious Lotts without regard of the cautions, in theis li∣centious times. As Vsurers regard not the cautions which Divines sett downe. For it is enough to them, that some godly Divines affirme Vsury to be lawfull. O that Mr. Gataker had considered what he writeth, pag. 107. before cited, and what he writeth, pag. 103. and 104. viz: Where inconveniences, that shall necessarily, or in good pro∣bability, appeare to accompany the thing questioned, or ensu vpon the doing thereof, shall be such, and so great as the Conve∣niences, which stand on the other side, shall not be able to counter∣vaile, there that action is worthily disallowed as Inconvenient, and Lott consequently vnlawfull, wha he writeth in his spirituall Watch pag. 27. viz: The rifer any evill i in those places, or ages we live i

Page 41

the more carefull should we be to shunne, and avoide such a sinne. No doubt he would have taken heede how by writing he make way to the sinne of, or by, Lusorious Lotts. Many Divines and intelli∣gent men, though of opinion that Lusorious mixed Lotts may be vsed lawfully, yet wish that Mr. Gataker had never published his booke. For a running horse (say they) needeth no spurring. For my part I wish, that Mr. Gataker had beene affected in writing, as he professeth himselfe to be in the vse of luso∣rious Lottes, pag. 266. Wel; What∣soever he writeth dogmatically, he wisheth thee (good Reader) to imitate him in▪ his practise, to witt, That, albeit in judgment thou art rightly informed of the truth concerning the lawful∣nesse of theis games in them∣selves; yet in godly discretion,

Page 42

thou wouldst rather abandō them, considering the too too common, and ordinary abuse of them, and that many (it may be) among whom thou livest may remaine vnresol∣ved, and vnsatisfied, touching the lawfulnes of them, pag. 267. I desire the same, and therewith a suspen∣ding thy judgment vntill thou hast well considered my Dialogue, Mr. Gatakers answeres, and my Reply, together with mine answere to his positive groundes. Here I promi∣se (with Mr. Gataker, pag. 128.) to raze what I have reared, if my Reply and aunsweres be prooved insuf∣ficient, and so commend thee to God, and to the Word of his Gra∣ce, which is able to build further. Onely, consider what I say, and the Lord give thee vnderstanding in* 1.12 all things.

14. Septemb. 1620.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.