Page [unnumbered]
Their DIET.
AS for their food, it may be objected, that it is but course and simple: for defence whereof, I might answer, that it is therefore the more healthfull, and agreeable to Nature, who is best pleased with meats of simple qualities. But it is further objected, that it is sluttishly drest, transeous and loathsome. How know we that? Because we love it not, is it there∣fore unwholesome? One man loveth no Fish, an other no Cheese, another no Flesh; which are not onely hurtfull, but poison to their constitutions. Should we therfore infer, that Fish, Cheese or Flesh, are poyson? such judges are we of their food, which best agreeth with their constitutions, and preserveth them in health, strength and vigour; for they eate not, but for Necessity, knowing no other sauce than the Lacedemonian sauce, Hunger; eating rather for preservation of life, than delight or luxury: whilst we in our Diet are so voluptuous, that we even dig our graves with our teeth, (as the French proverb hath it) the whole world being scarse sufficient to make a Bacchanalian sacrifice for that Deity, the Belly: France, Spain, Italy, the Indies, yea and the Molluqes must be ransackt, to make sauce for our meat; whilst we impoverish the land, air and wa∣ter, to in rich a privat Table. Thus we live, as if we were born to no other end, but by Gluttony and surfetting to oppose Nature, dull the spirits, sub∣vert the animall faculties, and heap upon our selves an innumerable company of diseases, it being a maxime amongst our Europaean Physicians, that