againe and againe tell thee such a sinne is a great
sinne, and ought to be crucified, and yet thou cry∣est,
let it goe; and so for the duty, it tels thee again
and againe it ought to be submitted unto, and yet
thou omittest it, and committest the sin, choosest
Barrabas rather than Christ, these are sinnes against
knowledge: now such sins against knowledg break
a mans peace, and the more consideration before
had, the more the peace is broken.
The second distinction is, that men sinne against
knowledg, either directly, or collaterally: objectively,
or circumstantially.
First directly: when knowledge it selfe is the
thing men abuse, or fight against, becommeth the [ 1]
object, the terminus, the butt and mark shot at; this
is to sin directly against knowledge it selfe.
The second way, collaterally, is, when knowledge
is but a circumstance in our sinnes: so as the pleasure [ 2]
of some sinne (we know to be a sin) is the thing ai∣med
at; & that our knowledge steps but in between
to hinder us in it, and we commit it notwithstan∣ding,
though we doe know it; here knowledge is in∣deed
sinned against, yet but collaterally, and as a stan∣der
by, but as a circumstance onely, shot at per acci∣dens,
concomitanter, and by the by, as one that steps
in to part a fray is smitten, for labouring to hinder
them in their sin, as the Sodomi••es quarrelled with
Lot: they are both found in this Chapter, and
therefore come fitly within the compasse of this
discourse.
First, This collaterall kinde of sinning against
knowledge is mentioned in the 21. verse, where he