MART. 11. Insomuch that immediatly in the first Ca∣nons* 1.1 and Councels of the Apostles and their successors, nothing is more common than this distinction of Ecclesiasticall degrees and names, Si Episcopus, vel Presbyter, vel Diaconus, &c. If any Bishop, or Priest, or Deacon doe this or that. Which if the Protestantes or Caluinistes will translate after their maner thus, If a Bishoppe, or Elder, or Deacon, &c. they doe against them selues, which make Presbyter or Elder a common name to all Ecclesiastical persons: and not a peculiar degree, next vnto a Bishop. So that either they must condemne all antiquity for placing Presbyter in the 2. degree after a Bi∣shoppe, or they must translate it Priest as we doe, or they must make Elder to be their seconde degree, and so put Minister out of place.
FVLK. 11. The distinction of Episcopus▪ and Pres∣byter to signifie seuerall offices, we graunt to be of great antiquitie, albeit we may not admitte the counterfaite Canons of the Apostles, nor the Epistles of Ignatius, for suche mens writings as they beare the name to be. We make Presbyter, or Elder, a common name to all Eccle∣siasticall persons, none otherwise, than you doe this word Priest. For Deacons with vs, are not called Presby∣teri, or Elders. As for the distinction of Bishoppes and