The Argument propounded. §. 1.
2. THe Argument I set downe in this manner. No man shalbe, or can be damned eternally, for errours, which be not damnable of themselues. This is cleere; Because God being iust, who renders to euery one according to their deserts, cannot punish men more then their offences do of themselues deserue, but rather somewhat vnder their merit. But the errours pre∣tended to be found in the Roman Church, cannot of thē∣selues deserue eternall damnation, being but veniall, but little ones, & not damnable of themselues, as Protestants grant. This Assumption needs no proofe, being noto∣rious ouer all England. For what more dayly and vsuall, what more frequent and familiar, then for Protestants to reproach vs with want of Charity; because we will not yield their errours not to be damnable nor destru∣ctiue of saluation, as they grant ours to be. This is cōfirmed by the often reiterated confession of D. Potter specially pa. 77. where he hath these words:
To forsake the errours of the Roman Church, and not to ioyne with her in those practises we account erroneous, we are forced of necessity. For though in themselues they be not damna∣nable to them which belieue as they professe; yet for vs to profese what we belieue not, were without question damnable. And they with their errours (by the grace of God) might go to Heauen, when we for our hypo∣crisy and dissimulation without repentance, should certainly be condemned to Hell. And agayne: To him who