An adioynder to the supplement of Father Robert Persons his discussion of M. Doctor Barlowes ansvvere &c. Contayning a discouery, and confutation of very many foule absurdityes, falsities, and lyes in M. D. Andrewes his Latin booke intituled, Responsio ad apologiam Cardinalis Bellarmini &c. An answere to the apology of Card. Bellarmine. Written by F.T. ... Also an appendix touching a register alleaged by M. Franc. Mason for the lawfull ordayning of Protestant bishops in Q. Elizabeths raigne.

THE TABLE OF CHAPTERS.

THE Authours intention is declared, and M. D. Andrews his interpretation of Pasce oues meas, examined, and con∣futed. [ 1] Furthermore it is shewed, that he hath belyed S. Au∣gustine, corrupted S. Ambrose, notably abused S. Cyril, vainely carped at a Law in the Code, and foolishly approued the vnlawfull proceeding of Iustinian the Emperour against the Pope. CHAP. I.

Pag. 1.

The Answeres of M. Andrewes to certaine places of the Councell of Calcedon are examined, and con••uted. His notable fraud in [ 2] diuers things, and especially in the allegation of a Canon of that Councell is discouered: and the supreme authority of the Sea Apo∣stolike clearely proued out of the same Councell and Canon. CHAP. II.

Pag. 39.

M. D. Andrewes his answeres to three places of the Fathers are [ 3] examined. And by the way the Cardinall is cleared from a false im∣putation of Iouinians heresie•• and M. Andrewes truly charged therwith. Finally all that which we teach concerning the Popes au∣thority, is necessarily deduced out of M. Andrewes his owne doctrine and expresse wordes. CHAP. III.

Pag. 98.

Foure other places of the Fathers are debated, and M. Andrewes his Answeres therto confuted. VVith a Discouery of notable corruption & [ 4] falsity in him: and of three manifest lyes within little more then three lines. And by occasion therof, it is also proued, that 8. Popes who liued in S. Augustines time, had, and excercised an vniuersall and supreme Authority. CHAP. IIII.

Pag. 133.

M. Andrewes his answeres to three other places, alleadged by the [ 5] Cardinall out of the Fathers, are examined and confuted, and diuers, absurdities discouered therin. And finally he is proued to be a wrangler in the highest degree. CHAP. V.

pag. 193.

A further manifestation of M. Andrewes his trifling, wrangling, [ 6] and fraudulent humour, by his Answeres to other places of the Fa∣thers, concerning Prayer to Saintes, which he deuideth into

three ranks, wherof the two first are examined in this Chapter. CHAP. VI.

Pag. 218.

[ 7] The Answeres of M. Andrewes to the Fathers of the third ranke, are examined, and sound to be either impertinent, fraudulent, or most iniurious to them; namely to S. Ambrose, whom he most egregi∣ously abuseth. Also it is euidently shewed, that the Inuocation of Saints was generally practised, & approued aswell by the ancient Fathers, as by all other faithfull Christians, in the Primitiue Church. CHAP. VII.

Pag. 258.

[ 8] Certaine obiections of M. Andrewes against Prayers to Saints are answered, and by the way, an imposture of the pretended Bishops, and Clergy of the Prouince of Canterbury in a Synodicall Canon of theirs is discouered. And finally M. Andrews is proued to haue notably wrangled, iugled, and trifled throughout this whole Con∣trouersy. CHAP. VIII.

Pag. 306.

[ 9] The Conclusion of this Adioynder, deuided into two Chapters. In this are detected diuers srauds and shifts common to M. Andrewes with M. Barlow; as to change the state of the question, dissemble that which most importeth in the Cardinalls text and argument; to abuse wrest, bely and falsisy not only the Cardinall, but also the ancient Fa∣thers, Councells, and holy Scriptures: and finally to face out matters impudently for lack of proofes. CHAP. IX.

Pag. 361.

[ 10] That M. Andrews ouerthroweth his owne cause, and fortifieth ours, graunting many important points of Catholike Religion: That he is turned Puritan in the point of the Kings Ecclesiasticall Supremacy. and betrayeth his Maiesties cause vnder-hand, pretending to defend it: and therfore is neither good English Protestant, nor yet good Subiect. Lastly what is the opinion of learned strangers concerning him, and his booke: with a good aduise for a friendly farewell. CHAP. X.

Pag. 329.

An Appendix touching a Register alleaged by M. Franc. Mason for the lawfull Ordayning of Protestant Bishops in Q. Elizabeths Raigne.