A second parallel together with a vvrit of error sued against the appealer.

About this Item

Title
A second parallel together with a vvrit of error sued against the appealer.
Author
Featley, Daniel, 1582-1645.
Publication
London :: Printed [by J. Haviland] for Robert Milbourne,
M.DC.XXVI. [1626]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Montagu, Richard, 1577-1641. -- Appello Caesarem -- Early works to 1800.
Pelagianism -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Arminianism -- Controversial literature -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Cite this Item
"A second parallel together with a vvrit of error sued against the appealer." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/a00601.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 2, 2024.

Pages

Harmony.
Church of Rome.

BEllarmine de Romno pon∣tif. lib. 3. c. 13. The seat of Antichrist shal be in Ierusalem▪ not Rome; for E¦noch and Elias are to fight with Anti∣christ in Ierusalem.

Ibid. c. 12. Anti∣christ shall properly come for the Iewes, and shall be receiued

Page 38

by them as the Mes∣sias; he shall be cir∣cumcised, and keepe the Sabbath for a time.

Ibid. cap. 18. The frensies of Hereticks are refelled, by wch they do not so much proue, as impiously affirme, that the Pope is Antichrist.

This conclusion is the scope of his whole third book; and he, and all Pa∣pists, who haue written of this ar∣gument, apply themselues wholly to proue, that nei∣ther the Pope per∣sonally, nor the Popes successiuely constitute that An∣tichrist, described in the Apocalyps.

Page 37

Appealer.

ANsw. to Gagg page 74. 75. I am not of opinion, that the Bishop of Rome personally, is that Antichrist, nor yet that the Bishops of Rome successiue∣ly, are that Anti∣christ, so spoken of.

App. p. 146. Whe∣ther the Pope of Rome, or the Popes

Page 38

of Rome, either are, or may bee accoun∣ted, or is that An∣tichrist, or Anti∣christs, my irresolu∣tion grew, as I haue remembred, from the much insuffici∣ency of their proofs, that tender it stout∣ly, strongly, affectio∣nately, and tantum non, as a point of faith. Not any one of their arguments is, not all their ar∣guments together are, conuincing.

Appeale p. 149. I incline to the more moderate, and tem∣perate tenent, and rather of the two, embrace, the Tur∣kish & Popish estate, not seueral, but con∣ioyned, doe consti∣tute That Anti∣christ, then either of the two states disioy∣nedly: and of the two states, rather the Turk by much, then the Pope. Ibid. p. 144. Why

Page 39

should it not be as lawfull for mee to opine, that the Pope is not that Antichrist, as for others to write, to preach, to publish, to tender to proceeders this proposition, The Pope is Antichrist? Ib. p. 154. The Turk is, and hath bin long possessed of Ierusalem, that holy City. The Iewes, when Mahomet first declared himselfe, came flocking vnto him, as to their Messias, the sooner, & rather, because hee was circumcised.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.