The grand sacrilege of the Church of Rome, in taking away the sacred cup from the laiety at the Lords Table: detected, and conuinced by the euidence of holy Scripture, and testimonies of all ages successiuely from the first propagation of the catholike Christian faith to this present: together with two conferences; the former at Paris with D. Smith, now stiled by the Romanists B of Calcedon; the later at London with M Euerard, priest: by Dan. Featly, Doctor in Diuinity.

About this Item

Title
The grand sacrilege of the Church of Rome, in taking away the sacred cup from the laiety at the Lords Table: detected, and conuinced by the euidence of holy Scripture, and testimonies of all ages successiuely from the first propagation of the catholike Christian faith to this present: together with two conferences; the former at Paris with D. Smith, now stiled by the Romanists B of Calcedon; the later at London with M Euerard, priest: by Dan. Featly, Doctor in Diuinity.
Author
Featley, Daniel, 1582-1645.
Publication
London :: Printed by Felix Kyngston for Robert Milbourne, and are to be sold in Pauls Churchyard at the signe of the Greyhound,
1630.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Smith, Richard, 1566-1655.
Everard, Thomas, 1560-1633.
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A00597.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The grand sacrilege of the Church of Rome, in taking away the sacred cup from the laiety at the Lords Table: detected, and conuinced by the euidence of holy Scripture, and testimonies of all ages successiuely from the first propagation of the catholike Christian faith to this present: together with two conferences; the former at Paris with D. Smith, now stiled by the Romanists B of Calcedon; the later at London with M Euerard, priest: by Dan. Featly, Doctor in Diuinity." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A00597.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 4, 2024.

Pages

The answer.

First, there is a double essence of the sacra∣ment, * 1.1 the generall essence, which makes it a sa∣crament in generall, and the specificall essence, which makes it in speciall, Baptisme, or the Lords Supper. To bee a visible, and effectuall signe of inuisible sanctifying grace is sufficient to proue a sacrament in generall: but not to proue the Lords Supper; the entire definition whereof is, a Sacrament of the new Testament, sea∣ling vnto vs the perfect nourishment of our soules, by the participation of the sacred elements of bread and wine.

Secondly, there are two sorts, or parts essen∣tiall, * 1.2 or integrall. For example; the essentiall parts of a man are animal rationale; the inte∣grall parts are legges and armes, and other members. In like manner, in the Sacrament, be∣sides the essentiall parts, which p 1.3 Bellarmine will haue to bee the signe and the thing signified, there are integrall parts, to wit, the elements of bread and wine, of which if either be wanting, the sacrament may be as truly called a maimed or vnperfect Sacrament, as a man that wants an arme, or legge, is truly called a maimed, or vn∣perfect man, though he haue in him the essen∣tiall parts of a man intirely, to wit, animal his Genus, and rationale, his difference.

Page 204

Thirdly, although in the Romane halfe Communion there be a signe, and a thing sig∣nified; yet neither is there the whole signe, nor the whole signification; not the whole signe, because bread is but a part of the signe, repre∣senting Christs body, and not his blood; not the whole signification, which is such an entire refection and nourishment of the soule, as bread and wine are of the body.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.