Page 194
This argument hath two parts, the, first is ta∣ken from the custome of the Greeke Church, * 1.1 the latter from a custome of the Romane. To dispatch first the latter, because it is of smal mo∣ment; we say, that there is no ground for this custome: we dislike it no lesse, then the halfe Communion it selfe. For why should not the Sacrament be consecrated vpon good Friday, as well as any other day? Or what an argu∣ment is this; the Priest communicateth in one kind alone on good Friday, therefore the peo∣ple ought to be depriued of the Cup all the yeere long? And why, I pray you, doth the Priest receiue the Sacrament on Good-Friday in bread onely, more then any other day? And why doe they communicate in such bread on∣ly, as was consecrated the day before? Why might they not consecrate it on that day? As some Gramarians excuse all Homers fables of the Gods, by turning them into Allegories, and Mythologicall expositions. So Harding diuision 22. arti. 2. salueth this superstitious cu∣stome, by telling vs, that it was not without sig∣nification of a singular mysterie. This mysterie is reuealed vnto vs by Pope Innocentius, Aqui∣nas, and Hugo Cardinalis. Innocentius saith, that it is, because the Apostles ran their way that day, and hid themselues. Aq•…•…inas saith, they conse∣crate not on Good-Friday, because if any had