Page 275
An appendix to the former Con∣ference.
Vntruths vttered by Master Euerard.
HEe saith, it is the doctrine of the Romane Catholikes generally, that the people are not bound to receiue the Communion in bread determinately, but that they may, if the Church please so to appoint, receiue it in wine onely. On the contrary, see Bellarmine, li. 4. de sac. Euch. 6. 25. * 1.1 Although Christ did not giue bread to the Laietie, yet he did not forbid it to be giuen them, and elsewhere hee commanded it to bee giuen them. And Bellarmine saith a little after: S. Luke, after the Sa∣crament giuen vnder the forme of bread, addeth, Doe this: but he repeateth it not after the giuing of the Cup, that we might vnderstand, that our Lord com∣manded that the Sacrament should bee giuen vnder the forme of bread to all, but not vnder the forme of wine.
Againe, Fisher in his answer to certaine que∣stions propounded by King Iames, contradicts directly this assertion of Master Euerard, tou∣ching Communion in both kinds. Sect. 4. This precept (doe this) being the onely precept giuen by Christ to his Church, and giuen absolutely of the forme of bread, conditionally of the forme of wine, there is no colour to accuse the Church of doing against this Precept.