without doubt I should seeme to post him ouer with delayes, I will therefore referre it to the ende of this booke, where as many as will haue all things (after their common saying) at their fingers endes, may both reade all, and carefully committ the whole to memorie. But nowe let vs pro∣ceede on in the things which we haue chiefely purposed to handle, that is to saye, howe Dioscorus bewrayed him selfe, partly by reiecting the Epistle of Leo byshopp of old Rome, and partly also by deposing Flauianus byshop of newe Rome, all which he did in one day, and craftely deuised that the byshops whiche assembled together should subscribe vnto a blancke, where afterwards he caused the depriuation of Flauianus to be written. when these thinges were done, the senators decreed as followeth. The next day after when the councell aduised them selues somewhat better, we doe perceiue that they reasoned more exquisitly of the true and catholicke fayth. VVherefore seeinge that Flauianus the byshopp of worthie memory and Eusebius the most reuerende by∣shopp of Dorilaeum were founde not to haue erred in the fayth after we had searched the actes and decrees of the councell, and also by the report of suche as were chiefe in the councell, and therefore vniustly to haue beene deposed (for they confessed them selues sowly deceaued and wrongfully to haue depriued Flauianus and Eusebius) It seemeth good vnto vs, and no doubt God approueth the same, that Dioscorus the most reuerend byshop of Alexandria (if it so please our Lorde the Emperour) Iuuenalis the most reuerend byshop of Ierusalem, Thalassius the most reuerend byshop of Caesarea in Cappodocia, Eusebius the most reuerende byshop of Armenia, Eu∣stathius the most reuerend byshop of Berytus, & Basilius the most reuerende byshop of Seleucia in Isauria (who were then of autority and chief of the councell) should be punished alike, depo∣sed of their byshopricks, by the censure & iudgemēt of the councell, as the canons of the church doe require, & be at the emperours pleasure. Immediatly there were other bils exhibited against Dioscorus both of the crimes he committed, and the money he had receaued: but when Dioscorus being called y• second & the third time of y• councel, sent fained excuses for him self & came not, y• Le∣gats of Leo byshop of old Rome, stood vp in y• councel, & said as followeth, The haino{us} offēces which Dioscorus late byshop of the noble city of Alexandria, cōmitted against the canons of the coun∣cells, & the ecclesiastical discipline are throughly knowē of vs al, partly by sifting out such things as were heard in the former session, and partly also by examining such things as we decided this day. And that we may omit many other things, this man of his owne autority cōtrary to the ca∣non of the church receaued Eutyches into the cōmunion, an heretick of the same opinion with him, & one that was iustly deposed by his owne proper byshop, to wit, the most holy father, and our byshop Flauianus: & this he did before he shewed his face in the councel which he held with the most holy byshops at Ephesus. but the Apostolicke seae pardoned the byshops because they were constrained against their wills to doe that whiche they did: who yeelded them selues vnto this present houre both to Leo the most holy byshop, & to the whole sacred & general assembly of byshops, & therefore as men of one opinion with him, he receaued thē into the cōmunion. As for this Dioscorus he cesseth not as yet to glory of the things for the which he ought to mourne, lament & lie groueling vpon the ground in sackcloth & ashes, not onely this but also he f••rbad the reading of holy Pope Leo his epistle written vnto Flauianus of godly memory, yea being oft intreated of the Legats, naye when he him selfe had promised with an othe he woulde procure it to be read. the default in not reading of which epistle, hath bene both an offence & hindrance vnto the holy churches vnder heauen. Although he was priuey to such lewde practises, yet haue we assēbled together, to thend we might deale somewhat fauourably both vvith him for all his former leudnes, and also in like sort with the other godly byshops which were not of equall au∣tority with him in iudgment. but seing that his later misdemenure exceeded his former impiety, for he sticked not to excōmunicate Leo the most holy and most religious archebyshop of Rome, moreouer whē shameful bills were exhibited against him, & he him self being cited once, twise, & the thirde time as the canon of the church hath cōmaunded by the godly byshops to appeare before the councel, yet would be not come, for his owne cōscience accused him, but entertained cōtrary vnto law such as were iustly deposed by diuers councells & set at naught sundry cōstitu∣tions of the church condemning as it were him selfe with his owne doings: once againe seeinge these are found to be his later practises, Leo the most holy archebyshop of great & olde Rome, by vs and this sacred assembly together with the most blessed Apostle S. Peter, who is the rocke, the grounde of the Catholicke Churche, and the fundation of the true fayth bereaued him of all dignitie that belongeth to a byshop, and depriued him of the priestly function▪ wherefore let