and in his onely begotten sonne Iesus Christ our Lorde, begotten of the Father before all worlds: God of God, lyght of lyght, by vvhome all thinges vvere made, both in heauen and in earth, be they visible or inuisible: who is the word, the wisdome, the power, the life & true light: who in the later dayes was incarnate for our sakes, was borne of the holy virgine, was crucified, dead and buryed: who rose againe the third day from the dead, ascended into heauen, & sitteth at the ryght hand of the father: who shall come in the end of the world, to iudge the quicke and the dead, to reward euery man according vnto his works whose kingdome shall haue no ende, but shall continevve for euer. For he shall sitte at the ryght hande of the Father, not onely vvhyle this vvorlde lasteth, but also in the lyfe to come. VVe beleeue also in the holye Ghost, that is in the Comforter, vvhome Christ promised to sende his Apostles after his ascention into heauen, vvhome also he sent for to teache, and leade them in all thynges, by vvhose meanes, the soules of them vvhich faithfully beleeue in him, are sanctified. vvho∣soeuer therefore dare presume to affirme: that the sonne had his beginninge of nothinge: or of any other substance then the Fathers: or that there vvas a tyme, or a vvorlde, vvhen he vvas not: these the holie and Catholicke churche doth holde for accursed. In like maner such as saye that there are three gods: or that Christ vvas not God from the beginninge: or that he is neyther Christ, neyther the sonne of God: or that there is neyther Father, neyther Sonne, neyther holie Ghost: or that the sonne is vnbegotten: or that the Father begatt not the sonne of his ovvne vvyll and purpose: these the holie and Catholicke church doth holde for accursed. Neyther can it be vttered vvithout blasphemie, that the sonne had his beynge of nothinge, in so much there can no such thinge be founde of him in ho∣lie scripture. Neyther doe vve learne that he had his beynge of any other preexistent sub∣stance, besydes the fathers, but that he vvas truely begotten of God the father alone. The holie scripture teacheth vs that the father of Christ is and vvas one vnbegotten, and vvithout beginning. Neyther may vve safely affirme vvithout testimonie of the sacred scripture, that there vvas a tyme vvhen he vvas not, as though vve shoulde imagine or forethinke in him, any temporall space: but vve haue to conceaue and comprehende in our mindes, God alone, vvhith begatt him vvithout tyme. For tymes and vvorldes vvere made by him. Neither can ere other, the father or the sonne properly be sayde, ioyntly to be vvithout beginninge, and ioynt∣ly vvithout begettinge: but as vve knovve the father alone to be vvithout beginninge, incom∣prehensble, and to haue begotten the sonne, after an incomprehensible, and an intelligible maner: so vve vnderstande the forme, to haue bene begotten before all vvorldes, and not to be vnbegotten after the same maner vvith the father, but to haue had a beginninge, the father vvhich begatt him, for the hea•••••• of Christ, is God. VVhen vve confesse three thinges, and three persons accordinge vnto the scriptures, to vvete: of the father▪ of the sonne, and of the holie Ghost, vve doe not therein allovve of three gods. For vve acknovvledge one onely God, perfect and absolute of him selfe, vnbegotten, vvithout beginninge, inuisible, the father of the onely begotten sonne, vvho alone of him selfe hath his beynge, vvho also alone ministreth aboundantly vnto all other things their beyng. And vvhen as vve affirme one God the father of our Lorde Iesus Christ, to be onely vnbegotten, vve doe not therefore deny Christ to haue bene God from euerlastinge, as the follovvers of Paulus Samosatenus dyd, vvhich affirmed that by nature he vvas but onely and bare man, after his in••••mation by profiting•• and forvvardnes to haue bene made God. VVe knovve though ••e be subiect to the father and to God, that he is God of God begotten accordinge vnto nature, that he is both a perfect and true God, and not made God aftervvardes of 〈…〉〈…〉: but that accordinge vnto the vvyll of God the father he vvas incarnate for our sakes, neuer aftervvardes lo••inge his di••••niti••. Moreouer vve detest and abhorre, and holde them for accursed, vvhich affirme that the sonne of God is the onely and naked vvorde of God, vvithout substance, but after a fayned and imaginatiue sort in an other: and one vvhyle doe terme him the vvorde as vttered by the mouth an other vvhyle as inclosed in the minde of some one or other: For they confesse not that euen Christ, vvho is Lorde, the sonne of God, the mediator, the image of God vvas before all vvorldes: but that he vvas Christ and the sonne of God from that tyme, since vvhich (novve full foure hundred yeares agoe) he tooke our fleshe of the Virgine. They vvyll haue the kingdome of Christ, from that tyme to haue his beginninge: and after the consummation of the vvorlde, and the dread∣full daye of iudgement, to haue his endinge. The authors of this abhominable heresie are