CAP. IIII.
Howe Constantinus the Emperour beinge carefull for the concorde & vnity of the churche sent Osius a Spanyarde vnto Alexandria to reconcile Alexander* 1.1 and Arius, wrytinge, also an epistle vnto both the parties
WHen the emperour was certified hereof he was wonderfull sorye and supposed this schisme to be his owne calamitye. Forthwith therefore he wente seriously about to quenche the heate of discorde kindled among them, and sent letters vnto Alexāder and Arius by a man worthy of creditt whose name was Osius byshop of Corduba a citye of Spayne, this man the emperour loued entierly and highely honored. Some parte of which letters I sup∣posed* 1.2 not impertinent for this place, which are wholy alleaged by Eusebius in his bookes of the life of Constantine.
Constantine the puysant, the mighty, and noble emperoure vnto Alexander and Arius sendeth greetinge.
Hereby I gather the originall grounde of this controuersie in that thou Alexander hast de∣maunded of the elders toutching a certaine place of holy Scripture yea rather toutching a cer∣taine* 2.1 vaine peece of a question, vvhat euery ones opinion vvas: and thou Arius hast vnaduisedly blased abrode and sett abroche that vvhich thou shouldest not at the first haue conceaued, and hauing conceaued it, thou shouldest haue past it ouer vvith silence. VVhereby this dissention is risen among you, the vvonted assembly of the church hindred, the most deuout people diuersly distracted into ether side & rente a sunder, being afore time one body cōpacted together in har∣moniacal vnity. wherefore let ether of you, pardoning ech other, like of that the which your fe∣lowe minister not without cause exhorteth you vnto: and what is that? that you neyther obiecte at all, neither answer any obiection that concerne such matters. For such questions as no law or ecclesiasticall canon necessarily defineth, but the frutelesse contention of idle braine setteth a∣brode, though the exercise thereof auaile for the sharpening of the witt, yet ought we to retaine them within the inner closett of our mind, & not rashly to broch them in the publique assembly of the vulgare people, neither vnaduisedly to graunt the common sorte the hearing thereof. For hovve many be there that can worthely explicate & sufficiētly ponder the weyght of so graue, so intricate, and so obscure a matter? but if there be any such that persuadeth himselfe able easily to compasse and to attaine vnto it, howe many partes are there (I beseche you) of the multitude whome he can sufficiently instruct therein? and who is there in sifting out so curious a question that can well passe the perill of plunging error? wherefore in suche cases we must refrayne from verball disputations lest that ether we by reason of the imbecillity of our witt, can not explicate