hauyng his heith NO, equall to A••, the first line: which parallelipipedon let be noted with GO. And suppose the cube of the third line (••F) to be ••M•• whose square base, let be noted by •••••• and hys heith by RM. I say now (secondly) that GO is equal to ••M. For the first part consider, that AI (the square base of AK) is to CQ, the square base of CL, as A•• is to the third line EF, by the ••. Corollary of the 20. of the sixth. But as A••, is to EF, so (by alternate proportion) is CD to GH, to CD. The cubes roote, is QL, the same cubes heith equall: and to GH is IK (by construction) equall: wherefore, as AI is to CQ, so is QL to IK. The bases therefore and heithes of AK and CL, are reciprocally in proporti∣on: wherefore by the second part of this 34. proposition, AK and CL are equall. For proofe of the se∣cond part of my theoreme, I say, that as AB, CD, ••F, and GH, are in continuall proportion forward, so are they backward in continuall proportion, as by the fourth of the fift may be proued. Wherefore now considering GH to be as first, and so A•• to be the fourth: the square base GN, is to the square base ••K, as GH is to CD, by the 2. corollary of the 20. of the sixth: But as GH is to CD, so is •••• to A••, by alternate proportion: to the Cubik roote ••F, is RM (the heith of the same Cube ••M) equall. And to AB, is the heith NO equall, by construction: wherfore as GN is to ••R, so is RM to NO. Therfore by the second part of this 34. proposition, GO is equall to EN. If fowre right lines (therefore) be in continu∣all proportion &c. as in the proposition: which was required to be demonstrated.