AB and BC is commēsurable to that which is contained vnder the lines AB and BC twise. Wherfore the squares of the lines AB and BC are incommensurable to that which is contai∣ned vnder the lines AB and BC twise. But vnto the squares of the lines AB and BC is equal the parallelogrāme DE, and to that which is cōtained vnder the lines AB and BC twise, is equall the parallelogramme DH. Wherefore the parallelogrāme DE is incōmēsurable to the parallelogramme DH. But as the parallelogramme DE is to the parallelogramme DH, so i•• the line GD to the line DF. Wherfore the line GD is incom∣mensurable
in lēgth to the line DF. And either of thē is ra∣tionall. Wherfore the lines GD and DF are rationall com∣mensurable in power onely. Wherfore the line FG is a residu∣all line (by the 73. proposition of the tenth) And the line DE is a rationall line. but a supe
ficies comprehended vnder a rationall line, and an irrationall line is irrationall (by the 21 of the te
icies is irrationall (by the assumpt going before the same) Wherfore the parallelograme FE is irrationall. But the line AC containeth in power the parallelogramme FE. Wherfore the line AC is an irrationall line and is called a second mediall residuall line. And this second mediall residuall line is that part of the greater part of a bimediall line which remayneth after the taking away of the lesse part from the greater: which was required to be proued.
An other demonstrtion more briefe after Campane.
Suppose that AB be a mediall line, from which take away the me∣diall
line
GB commensurable vnto the whole line
AB in power onely and contayning with it
•• mediall superficies, namely, that which is con∣tayned vnder the lines
AB and
BG. Then I say that the residue
AG is an i
••rationall line, and is called a second mediall residua
••l line. Take a ratio∣nall line
DC, vpon which apply a parallelogramme equall to that which is composed of the squares of the lines
AB and
BG, which by the 45. of the first let be
DCEI. Agayne let the parallelogramme
ZFEI be equall to that which is contayned vnder the line
•• AB and
BG twise. Wherfore the superficies remaining
DF is equal to the square of the line
AG by the 7. of the second. (For that which is contayned vnder the lines
AB and
BG twise together with the square of the line
A•• is equall to that which is composed of the squares of the lines
AB and B
G). And forasmuch as the squares of the lines
AB and
BG are mediall, for that they are descri∣bed of medial lines: the parllelogrāme
DE which is equal vnto thē, shall also be mediall. And foras
••uch as that which is cōtained vnder the lines
AB and
BG is by supposition mediall, therfore the superficie
•• Z•• which is double vnto it is also mediall. But the mediall superficies
DE excedeth not the mediall supe
••ficies
ZE by a rational superficies (by the 26. of this booke). Wherfore the excesse, namely, the super
••icies
D•• is irrationall, vnto which the square of the line
A•• is equall: wherefore the square of the line
A•• is ir
••ationall, and therefore the line
AG which contayneth it in power is irratio∣nall by the assumpt put before the 21. of this booke, and is called a second mediall residuall line.
This proposition setteth forth the nature of the tenth kinde of irrational lines, which is called a second residuall mediall line, which is thus defined.
A second residual•• mediall lyne is an irrationall lyne which remayneth, when from a medial line is taken away a mediall lyne commensurable to the whole in power onely, and the part taken away & the whole lyne contayne a mediall superficies.