to the parallelogrāme HI, therfore the parallelogrāme HI is also mediall, and is appli∣ed vnto the rationall line EF, that is, vnto the lyne HG making in breadth the line HK. Wherfore the lyne HK is rationall and incommensurable in length to the line EF (by the 2•• of the tenth.) And forasmuch as the superficies CD is mediall, and the superficies AB is ra∣tionall, therfore the superficies AB is incommensurable to the superficies CD. Wherfore also the parallelogramme EG is incommensurable to the parallelogramme HI. But as the paral∣lelogramme GE is to the parallelogramme HI, so (by the 1. of the sixt) is the line EH to the lyne HK. Wherfore (by the 10. of the tenth) the line EH is incommensurable in length to the line HK, and they are both rationall. Wherfore the lines EH and HK are rationall com¦mensurable in power onely. Wherfore the whole line EK is a binomiall line, and is deuided into his names in the poynt H. And forasmuch as the super••icies AB is greater then the su∣perficies CD, but the superficies AB is equall to the parallelogramme EG, and the superficies CD to the parallelogramme HI. Wherfore the parallelogramme EG is greater then the pa∣rallelogramme HI. Wherfore the line EH is greater then the line HK. Wherfore the line EH is in power more then the line HK either by the square of a line commensurable in length to the lyne EH, or by the square of a lyne incommensurable in length to the lyne EH. First let it be in power more by the square of a lyne cōmēsurable in lēgth vnto the line EH. Now the greater name, namely, EH is commensurable in length to the rational line geuen EF, as it hath already bene proued. Wherfore the whole line
EK is a first binomiall lyne. And the lyne EF is a rationall lyne. But if a superficies be contayned vn∣der a rationall line, and a first binomiall lyne, the lyne that contayneth in power the same superficies, is (by the 54. of the tenth) a binomiall line. Wherefore the lyne containing in power the parallelogramme EI is a binomiall line. Wherefore also the line contai∣ning in power the superficies AD is a binomiall line.
But now let the lyne EH be in power more then the line HK by the square of a line incommensurable in length to the line EH: now the greater name that is, EH is commensurable in length to the rationall line geuen EF. Wher∣fore the line EK is afourth binomiall line. And the line EF is rationall. But if a superfi∣cies be contained vnder a rationall line and afourth binomiall line, the line that containeth in power the same superficies is (by the 57. of the tenth) irrational, and is a greater line. Wher¦fore the line which containeth in power the parallelogramme EI is a greater line. Wherefore also the line containing in power the superficies AD is a greater lyne.
But now suppose that the superficies AB which is rationall, be lesse then the superficies CD which is mediall. Wherfore also the parallelogramme EG is lesse then the parallelogrāme HI. Wherfore also the line EH is lesse then the line HK. Now the line HK is in power more then the lyne EH either by the square of a line cōmensurable in length to the line HK, or by the square of a lyne incommensurable in length vnto the lyne HK. First let it be in power more by the square of a line commensurable in length vnto HK: now the lesse name, that is EH is commensurable in length to the rationall line geuen EF, as it was before proued. Wherfore the whole line EK is a second binomiall line. And the line EF is a rationall line. But if a superficies be contained vnder a rationall line and a second binomiall lyne, the lyne that contayneth in power the same superficies, is (by the 55. of the tenth) a first bimediall line. Wherfore the line which contayneth in power the parallelograme EI is a first bimediall line. Wherfore also the line that containeth in power the superficies AD is a first bimediall lyne.
But now let the line HK be in power more then the line EH, by the square of a line in∣cōmensurable