This proueth in numbers that which the 7. of the second proued in lines. For let the number A be deuided into the numbers B and D. Then I say that the square of A together with the square of D is equall to that which is produced of A into D twise together with the
square of
B. For it is manifest by the 6. of these propositions that the square of
A is equall to the squares of
B and
D together with that which is produced of
B into
D twise. Wherefore the square of
A together with the square of
D, is equall to two squares of
D•• and to that which is produced of
D into
B twise together with the square of
B. But by the first of these propositions two squares of
D, and that which is produced of
D into
B twise is e∣quall to that which is produced of
D into
A twise. Wherfore that which is produced of
D into
A twise together with the square of
B, is equall to the square of
A together with the square of
D: wherfore that is manifest which was required to be proued.