Page 205
¶The 4. Theoreme. The 6. Proposition. If there be numbers in continuall proportion how many soeuer, and if the first measure not the second, neither shall any one of the other measure any one of the other.
SVppose that there be numbers how many soeuer in continuall proportion, name∣ly, f••ue, A, B, C, D, E. And suppose that A measure not B. Then I say, that nei∣ther shall any other of the numbers A, B, C, D, E, measure any one of the other. That A, B, C, D, E, do not in continuall order measure one the other, it is mani∣fest: for A measureth not B. Now I say, that neither shall any other of them measure any o∣ther of them. I say that A shall not measure C. For how many in multitude A, B, C, are, take so many of the lest numbers that haue one and the same proportion with A, B, C, (by the 35. of the seuenth) and let the same be F, G, H.* 1.1 And forasmuch as F, G, H are in the selfe same