as often as you can leaue a lesse-then it selfe namely, CF. And suppos•• th••t CF do so mea∣sure AE that there remayne nothing. Then I say that CF is a common measure to the numbers AB and CD. For forasmuch as CF measureth AE, and AE measureth DF, therefore CF also measureth DF (by the fifth common sentence of the seuenth) and it likewise measureth it selfe, wherfore it also measureth the whole CD (by the sixth common sentence of the seuenth••)•• but CD measureth BE, wherefore CF also measureth BE (by the ••ifte common sentence of the seuenth). And it measureth also EA: wherefore it also measureth the whole BA (by the sixth common sentence of the seuenth): and it also measu∣reth CD as we haue before proued: wherefor•• the number CF measureth the numbers AB & CD wherfore the number CF is a commō measure to the numbers AB & CD.
I say also that it is the greatest common measure. For if CF be not the greatest commō measure to AB and CD, let there be a number greater then
CF, which measureth
AB and
CD: which let be
G. And forasmuch as
G measureth
CD, and
CD measureth
BE, therefore
G also measureth
BE (by the
••••ft common sentence of the seuenth). And it measureth the whole
AB, where∣fore also it measureth the residue, namely,
AE (by the 4. common sentence of the se∣
••enth). But
AE measureth
DF, wherefore
G also measureth
DF (by the foresayd 5. com∣mon sentence of the seuenth). And it measureth the whole
CD. Wherefore it also measu∣reth the residue
FC: namely, the greater number the lesse: which is impossible. No number therefore greater then
CF shall measure those numbers
AB and
CD: wherefore
CF is the greatest common measure to
AB and
CD: which was required to be done.
Corrolary.
Hereby it is manifest, that if a number measure two numbers it shall also measure their greatest common measure. For if it measure the whole & the part taken away, it shall alwayes measure the residue also, which residue is at the length, the greatest common measure of the two numbers geuen.