betwene them. Suppose three quantities A, B, C, so that let A haue to B sesqui∣altera proportion, namely, 6. to 4. And let B to C haue sesquitertia proportion, namely, 4. to 3. Now the proportion of A to
C, the first to the thyrd, is made of the propor∣tion of A to B, and of the proportion of B to to C added together. If ye will adde them to∣gether, ye must by this definition multiply the quantitie or denominator of the one, by the quātitie or denominator of the other. Ye must first therefore seeke the denominators of these proportions, by the rule before geuen in the declaration of the definitions of the fift Booke. As if ye deuide A by B, namely, 6. by 4, so shall ye haue in the quotient 1
••/
•• for the denominator of the proportion of A to B: likewise if ye deuide B by C, namely, 4. by 3. ye shall haue in the quotient 1
••/
•• for the denominator of the proportion of B to C, now multiply these two denominators 1
••/
•• and 1
••/
•• the one into the other, by the rule before taught, namely, by multiplying the numerator of the one into the nu∣merator of the other, and also the denominator of the one into the denominator of the other: the numerator of 1
••/
•• or of
••/
•• which is all one, is 3, the denomi∣nator is 2: the numerator of 1
••/
•• which reduced are
••/
•• is 4,
the denominator is 3: then multiply 3. by 4, numerator by nu∣merator, so haue ye 12. for a new numerator: likewise multiply 2. by 3. denominator by denominator, ye shall produce 6. for a new denominator: so haue you produced 12. and 6, betwene which there is dupla proportion. Which proportion is also be∣twene A and C, namely, 6. to 3, the first quantitie to the third. Wherfore the pro∣portion of A to C is sayd to be made of the proportion of A to B and of the pro∣portion of B to C, for that it is produced of the multiplication of the quantitie or denominator of the one, into the quantitie or denominator of the other. And so of all others be they neuer so many. As in these examples in numbers here set 2. 3. 15. 18. In this example the lesse numbers are compared to the greater, as in the former the greater were compared to the lesse: the denominator of the proporti∣on of 2. to 3. is 2/
•• that is, subsesquialtera, the denomination betwene 3. and 15. is
••/
•• or 1/
•• which is all one, that is, subquintupla, betwene 15. and 18. the denomi∣nation of the proportion is 1/6 that is, subsesquiquinta, multiply all these denomi∣nations together: first the numerators: 2. into 1. produce 2, then 2. into 5. produce 10: which shall be a new numerator. Then the de∣nominators:
3. into 5. produce 15: and 15. into 6. produce 90: which shall be a new denominator. So haue you brought forth 10/9
•• or 1/9 which is pro∣portion subnoncupla: which is also the proportion of 2. to 18. Wherefore the proportion of 2. to 18. that is, of the extremes, namely, subnoncupla, is made of the proportions of 2. to 3: of 3. to 15: and of 15. to 18: namely, of subsesquialtera, subquintupla, and subses∣quiquinta.
An other example, where the greater inequalitie and the lesse inequalitie are mixed together 6. 4. 2. 3. the denomination of the proportion of 6. to 4, is 1 ••/••, of 4. to 2, is ••/••, and of 2. to 3, is ••/••: now if ye multiply as you ought, all these denominations together, ye shall produce 12. to 6, namely, dupla proportion.
Forasmuch as so much hath hetherto bene spoken of addition of proportions