No. 165. Saturday, April 29, 1710.
From my own apartment, April 28.
IT has always been my endeavour to distinguish between realities and appearances, and to separate true merit from the pretence to it. As it ever shall be my study to make discoveries of this nature in human life, and to set∣tle the proper distinctions between the virtues and per∣fections of mankind, and those false colours and resem∣blances of them that shine alike in the eyes of the vulgar; so I shall be more particularly careful to search into the various merits and pretences of the learned world. This is the more necessary, because there seems to be a general combination among the pedants to extol one another's la∣bours, and cry up one another's parts; while men of sense, either through that modesty which is natural to them, or the scorn they have for such trifling commendations, enjoy their stock of knowlege like a hidden treasure with satisfaction and silence. Pedantry indeed in learning is like hypocrisy in religion, a form of knowlege with∣out the power of it, that attracts the eyes of the common people, breaks out in noise and show, and finds its re∣ward not from any inward pleasure that attends it, but from the praises and approbations which it receives from men.
Of this shallow species there is not a more importunate, empty, and conceited animal, than that which is general∣ly known by the name of a critic. This, in the com∣mon acceptation of the word, is one that, without enter∣ing into the sense and soul of an author, has a few gene∣ral rules, which, like mechanical instruments, he applies to the works of every writer, and as they quadrate with them, pronounces the author perfect or defective. He is master of a certain set of words, as unity, stile, fire,