AIDS Vaccine Panel Discussion [Minutes]

7-APR-97 PACHA AIDS VACCINE PANEL DISCUSSION - p. 33 DR. FAUCI: We do have government/industry collaboration within our granting process. For example, our National Cooperative Vaccine Development Groups, similar to our National Cooperative Drug Discovery Groups, have consortia with industry so that when funding goes through the usual peer review system, either for a grant or a contract, it does not exclude government de facto at all. In fact, actually, it does not exclude industry. Industry can be an important part of that and is an important partnership. So it isn't as if the NIH gets money and it's just NIH. As Bill said, that gets distributed throughout academia and industry as part of that. DR. LU: If I may, there is a funding program for the small business innovation grant called SBIR. It's very generous funding. The chance of getting that funding is much higher than an R-01, it is my understanding. The funding is the following: Phase I is where you just get $75,000 for 6 months, after which, if you are successful and you complete your goal, you are invited to go for the Phase II, which is $750,000 in the span of 3 years. The chance to get that is very hard. The most difficult part is that Phase I to Phase II, because the amount of money, as you can imagine, for Phase II is very limited in the NIAID. It's quite easy to get Phase I. For example, I wrote four of them, and my success rate so far has been 70 percent, 80 percent. But that amount of money is not near enough for you to produce your product in the grade that we call GMP [good manufacturing practice] grade to put into the human. So here comes the chicken-and-egg issue. If you don't have the money, you cannot produce it; if you cannot produce it, you cannot tie it to the human; you cannot tie it to the human without doing the work. But without this data, you cannot convince the study section to give you that money to go ahead with it. So here is the dilemma we're facing. MR. FOGEL: Does Dr. Sadoffhave anything to add? DR. SADOFF: Well, making vaccines is a staged process, and like many other manufacturing processes or other industries, although the early work seems to be expensive, it really gets much more expensive as you go up. To build a factory, for example, could cost hundreds of millions of dollars. So, therefore, there have to be very hard-nosed decisions and criteria for what goes forward and doesn't go forward, and what the biotechnology groups are talking about is trying to get products to that point where a decision could be made that something should go forward into the really expensive part of the endeavor, where you want to have as low a risk as possible and as high a possibility of having success.

/ 63

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 1-50 Image - Page 33 Plain Text - Page 33

About this Item

Title
AIDS Vaccine Panel Discussion [Minutes]
Author
Presidential Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS (U.S.)
Canvas
Page 33
Publication
1997-04-07
Subject terms
minutes
Item type:
minutes

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0495.210
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cohenaids/5571095.0495.210/33

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes, with permission from their copyright holder(s). If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission.

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/cohenaids:5571095.0495.210

Cite this Item

Full citation
"AIDS Vaccine Panel Discussion [Minutes]." In the digital collection Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0495.210. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 12, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.

Downloading...

Download PDF Cancel