[Email Exchange between Bruce Weniger and Sten Vermund]

Weniger, Bruce
From: PFAST [[email protected]]
Sent: 24-Jun-96 10:42
To: bgw2; ekmbidde; Edward_Mbidde; sten
Cc: sberkley; wcates; dburke; sammy; donaldf; mclement; esparzaj; messex;
PF131; halsteads; heywardw; 103645.1720; 72054.701; jmcneil;
cchandle; PKRussell; wmsnow
Subject: RE: Vaccine Policy Debate at
Return-Path: <PFAST@mercury. niaid.nih.gov>
Received: from cdcl by Smtpln.em.cdc.gov id <[email protected]>; Mon,
24 Jun 96 10:42:23 EST
Received: from alw.nih.gov by cdcl (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id AA22843; Mon, 24 Jun 1996
10:44:23 -0400
Received: from odie.niaid.nih.gov by alw.nih.gov (5.61/1.35(alw-2.4)) id
AA22600; Mon, 24 Jun 96 10:42:14 -0400
From: PFAST@mercury. niaid.nih.gov
Received: from mercury.niaid.nih.gov by odie.niaid.nih.gov (5.67b/mg-1.53) id
AA29298; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 10:42:13 -0400
Received: by mercury.niaid.nih.gov with Microsoft Exchange (IMC 4.0.837.3) id
<[email protected]>; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 10:42:04 -0400
Message-Id: <c=US%a=_%p=NIH%I=MERCURY-960624144201Z-5269@mercury. niaid.nih.gov
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]. UAB.EDU>
Cc: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<sammy@mendel. Berkeley.EDU>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<halsteads@mail-gw. nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Cc: <72054.701 @compuserve.com>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Vaccine Policy Debate at
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 10:42:01 -0400
X-Mailer: Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.837.3
Encoding: 187 TEXT
content-length: 6464
I see no benefit in focusing the debate on the merits or
otherwise of gpl20 per se! I had thought it would be a
philosophical discussion of the overall approach, rather
than a discussion of a particular vaccine candidate.
From: Sten Vermund[SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 1996 1:14PM
To: [email protected]; Mbidde, E.K. (Uganda); Mbidde,
Edward (alt address)
Cc: Seth Berkley; Ward Cates; 'Burke, Don (WRAIR/HJF)';
'Dorman, Burt (Acrogen)'; 'Francis, Don (Genenvax)';
Clements, Mary Lou (JHU); Esparza, Jose (UNAIDS); Essex, Max
(Harvard SPH); Fast, Pat (NIH); Halstead, Scott (USN);
Heyward, William (UNAIDS); Johnston, Peggy (IAVI); Lu,
Yichen (Virus Res Inst); McNeil, John (WRAIR/HJF); Nelson,
Kenrad (JHU); Russell, Philip (@aol.com); Snow, Bill
(ActUp-GG)
Subject: Re: Vaccine Policy Debate at
Reply to: RE>Vaccine Policy Debate at Vancouver

Edward and Bruce: I am sorry that I will miss this important event as I will
still be in Mongolia and China, leaving tomorrow for 3 weeks. I know John
well and he will use the AVEG/CHIP joint 401 protocol and the immunology data l lililllIIMi W i A[lfl
from the ADARC to characterize current rgpl20 candidates as having
5571095.0495.049