AIDS Amendment in NIH Reauthorizaiton Bill Begins to Draw Criticism

FEB 1 '93 11::5
-29-iF0:3? TS LJSM

LtJ
~ 2.757S;Tam!J hr'le

FPAGE. 002'

IT

AS
An ins
The no
a ~ the no
Of,.~
C it
aendmei
prec-adegt
Tbei i
Dc"., it:~
crgitc"
ovpwsitL*
that the
Ipositut
hud ina.
sD~O
the bill I
gu ms*

-U V NTNFAXL
rslo'R aruU @Wft3rfliuttn sen1@ea.

Ffagur erai, fwy _ -.

'V--

Life Serq
a sau4Z 29, 1993
C T$ gW TCRZ~ZL
(RH)and iico cbrs aaxe bgeqim.i-to j'.A~ ir L.a 7.'
of aZD ~~q
iof the uit* iic r-sbkoh i en wvould est l ih nthe
A$Rs=the Dir or - f 1 a.:.-a d Office *f A5 Zh(Q }
j's +n as~ "the. -vezr. Barrqaetcnc t or A.7.D4 se inrc ' at
de the CLIqed hi.zty its wur4i~q; te belrief tha~t 'the
1xoLzd Id l o gf agmjf ent yfaoinq o l
rime~ud 1ez1ion;that the aaodbnt1t.she a bd
by subvt b'o;eaatbority eofNI ~itia ent ad;o n tha. thi e diuat a SPassed bth. Senate
on~~~~se akri4umflReso1Iaroe,chjaLxtid bySe. dw~ardKaly
oxM auk p ~lic heiP 4 c= other opgozt. ty fKhe5 B~ n d
cwEumnity to d*b~Lt-e its merits or to pZovide ~Ltt~ the
before* its 16 to 0 vote(wase., 1/f27)
tbae-is ~ ht appe irs to be corUs3rbl. ppizaesa iwith pand
wu4 n bo n tte at sto - Ft quo ~by iae or a i.aiouCon-t him itreasons ~o
The SpecL.ti la is that no coo vats tobe* cimdasben:fe Uitln1 Cowa si on.n AD5, ~xd bya 13SO~~~
stat.net Sing~~ig; sVnet Zi32of OmR dsuggesting
fijg# s rats " S OI~d be tpr o#o,4 Ip, Ooeornt
i u:req~e!ea4ch 01:Kl/IS thronxot a3. r eean
=-t thie VI wit; s~b~t for ati r~aing a~n Nx-v ide
i 'ttee AIDS rsaar bpla~n, and~ the budgt au t ho r ity to dt
VW~u~ Ofta-nis potd.a. d ~iaeforth
f..siebnt srcreaxy or bha th atthe eazttof!a Iea1h an
a -r~to VimePresident (or~a ii h=0rl0 a. Peeidwnt of the
ng I1a, eoay f a~t nd lED= erios, 6sta tdthat
s the 46p t's' g
"d that whL2Le her dpxnn has roee rvtio aboi r the deLed
a sa adainist.rj.odrecaivwewad tcu e vzzy s ci
tntabill3...-a Clinton a Z stn.s~~ot
aXS -eae arch zo i. we believe the bill povides a
fr drermrz Xt zearno 4,. an fecie anea d1

5571095.0485.054

- -..