[Summary of the Defendant’s Response to Allegations, Peter Lurie, et al. v. Department of the Army]

07/10/95

14:36 MEYER & GLITZENSTEIN -* 4155979213

NO. 373 D03

and reaacted portions of the released records relying on exemptions
5, 6, and 7(C) of FOIA, 5 U.S.C. SS 552(b)(5), 552(b)(6) and
552 (b) (7) (c). The remaining allegations of the second sentence are
denied.
8. Admit
9. With regard to the first sentence, Defendant admits that
Plaintiffs attached to their November 1, 1994 letter a document
that purports to be a statement from an individual. Defendant
lacks sufficient information to either admit or deny the remaining
allegations in the sentence. The second sontence i~ dened
11-12. Deny
Defendant denies that Plaintiffs are entitled to the relief
sought or to any relief whatsoever.
To the extent not expressly admitted or qualified above,
Defendant denies each allegation in the Complaint.
Respectfully submitted,
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., DC Bar #303115
United States Attorney
ROBERT L. SHAPIRO, DC BAR #415854
Assistant United States Attorney
Of Counsel:
MAJOR KELLY D. WHEATON
United States Army Litigation Center