[Summary of the Defendant’s Response to Allegations, Peter Lurie, et al. v. Department of the Army]

07/10/95 14:36 MEYER & GLITZENSTEIN - 4155979213 NO. 373 I02
I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUM3IA
PETER LURIE, ET AL., )
Plaintiffs, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No. 95-1085 JHG
)
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, )
)
Daefendant. )
ANSWER
Defendant responds to the specific allegations of the
Complaint as follows:
paragraph i are Plaintiffs' characterization of this action and
conclusions of law to which no response is required. Defendant
admits the allegations contained in the second sentence of the
paragraph.
2. The allegations contained in paragraph 2 are conclusions
of law to which no response is required.
3. Defendant lacks sufficient knowledge to either admit or
deny the allegations in the first sentence of the paragraph. The
second sentence of the paragraph is admitted.
4. Defendant lacks sufficient information to either admit or
deny the allegations in the first sentence of the paragraph.
Defendant admits the allegation in the second sentence of the
paragraph.
5-s. Admit

7. The first sentence is admitted. With regard to the
second sentence, Defendant admits that the Army withheld records
IllIIIII l lI llIIIIIIIIIIIII ll lllIII III IIIIIIIIII IIII IIII
5571095.0466.057