[Memorandum Opinion and Order, Peter Lurie, plaintiff v. Department of the Army, defendant]

(-)
7(C); the material sheds no light on the conduct of the agency and, while the privacy
interests are, at best, de minimis, something outweighs nothing every time.
As to Document No. 73 (Statement of Dr. Hendrix), the following material shall
be disclosed:
1. paragraph 2 on page 1 up to and including the fourth full paragraph on
page 9; and
2. the first (full) and second paragraphs on page 10.
The last paragraph on page 9 (which carries over onto page 10) sheds no light on
the Army's gp 160 vaccine testing program, its relationship to ASAP or its investigation
into scientific misconduct, and it may be withheld under Exemption 7(C).
As to Document No. 74 (Statement of Dr. R. Neal Boswell), the following
material shall be disclosed:
1. paragraph 2 on page 1 up to and including paragraph 4 on page 1, which
carries over to page 2;
2. the second full paragraph on page 2 up to and including the first
sentence of the fourth paragraph on page 2 (which ends with the word
"misinterpreted"); and
3. the last paragraph on page 2 which carries over to page 3.
Because the first full paragraph on page 2 and the last two sentences of paragraph
4 on page 2 are of a non-factual nature and shed no light on the Army's gp l60 vaccine
testing program, its relationship to ASAP or its investigation into scientific misconduct,
that material may continue to be withheld under Exemption 7(C).
As to Document No. 75 (Statement of Dr. Charles Davis), the single sentence that
is redacted may be withheld under Exemption 7(C). The material sheds no light on the

51