Clinical Evaluation of Therapeutic Vaccines for HIV Seropositives: Approaches to the Design of Efficacy Trials
consensus of both researchers and the communities at risk that speeding up the process is worth some increased risk of errors in establishing efficacy or even lack of harm. In this light, another approach to testing a new modality such as therapeutic vaccines could be the implementation of a large trial in which clinical benefit could be addressed in all CD4 categories, immediately following the completion of Phase I. The goals of such a trial would be twofold: 1. To detect reliably a clinically meaningful effect of the treatment; 2. To study possible correlations of effects on intermediate outcomes (e.g., immune responses, immunologic and virologic markers) with clinical outcomes, so that future vaccine trials could be based on these earlier outcomes. Thus, this approach essentially nests the Phase II study within the Phase III study. An outline of such a trial is as follows: o Fundamental design: -Randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial with broad eligibility criteria and clinical endpoints o Patient population: HIV-infected individuals at any stage of disease with no contraindication to any of the trial products o Products to be tested: Multiple products, preferably providing a broad range of product types, with a placebo control. o Limitations on concomitant medication: None (except for other therapeutic vaccines). No restriction on participation in other clinical trials. o Primary endpoint: First AIDS-defining event or death, depending on prior history o Time frame: One year of patient accrual; 3-4 years of followup. o Stratification: Three strata, according to entry CD4 level (under 200; 200-500; and over 500) per cubic mm. o Data to be collected: Baseline data (demographics, CD4 count, current therapies, prior AIDS-defining events) collected by telephone at time of randomization; minimal followup data focusing on toxic reactions and clinical outcomes requested semiannually on paper form. More detailed data collected from selected sites to develop fuller understanding of vaccine-induced immune responses and associations with changes in immunologic and virologic markers. o Sample size: Sufficient to detect a one-third reduction in risk in each stratum, and a 25% reduction overall. Actual numbers will depend on number of products to be tested, and duration of followup. With 3 4
About this Item
- Title
- Clinical Evaluation of Therapeutic Vaccines for HIV Seropositives: Approaches to the Design of Efficacy Trials
- Author
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U.S.). Division of AIDS
- Canvas
- Page 4
- Publication
- 1992-11-22
- Subject terms
- reports
- Series/Folder Title
- Government Response and Policy > Law > gp160 trials and controversy > National Institute of Health (U.S.) GP160 Meeting, Blue-Ribbon Panel (1992)
- Item type:
- reports
Technical Details
- Collection
- Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection
- Link to this Item
-
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0463.014
- Link to this scan
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cohenaids/5571095.0463.014/5
Rights and Permissions
The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes, with permission from their copyright holder(s). If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission.
Related Links
IIIF
- Manifest
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/cohenaids:5571095.0463.014
Cite this Item
- Full citation
-
"Clinical Evaluation of Therapeutic Vaccines for HIV Seropositives: Approaches to the Design of Efficacy Trials." In the digital collection Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0463.014. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 6, 2025.