Panel to Review GP160 Vaccine Candidate: Report of the Meeting

development, Dr. Corey said. For instance, it might make sense to use a "more natural" vaccine candidate--perhaps a gpl60 or gpl20 product carrying sugar groups that more closely resemble those found on HIV itself (as produced on experimental vaccines being made in mammalian cell systems)--than to continue with a glycoprotein vaccine whose sugar groups are acquired in nonmammalian cells and thus are less like those found on envelope proteins in clinical isolates of HIV. Moreover, possibly other components of HIV rather than the envelope proteins in the gpl60 and gpl20 products will prove more useful in eliciting a protective response, particularly from cytotoxic T cells in the host, he said. MicroGeneSys CEO raises objections. Mr. Franklin Volvovitz, the CEO of MicroGeneSys, objected to the fact that Dr. Corey and not Dr. Redfield of WRAIR had been asked to summarize the latter's data. Dr. Volvovitz also criticized Dr. Corey's interpretation of certain gpl60 studies, asserting that the presentations were based on selection of data rather than being "open and objective...without bias." For example, Dr. Volvovitz and Dr. Corey appear to disagree over animal model studies (involving SCID mice) undertaken to determine (by indirect means) whether gpl60 can confer protective immunity on human recipients. Dr. Corey pointed to results indicating first a protection and the a loss of protection; Mr. Volvovitz said that efforts to confirm these early studies showing partial protection with combination gpl60 vaccines were unsuccessful. He described studies that showed no protection in the SCID-hu mouse model with either the MicroGeneSys gpl60 vaccine alone or in combination with other vaccines. Mr. Volvovitz also raised several other issues--some technical, but others more general in nature. Among issues from the latter category, he posed a complex question that other meeting participants still face: What is the relative importance of the humoral and cellular immune responses in individuals who are fighting HIV infections and what impact will vaccine treatments have on them? Although discussions were abbreviated, he was promised that these issues would be addressed more fully at a follow-up meeting. AIDS VACCINE DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS With so many AIDS vaccine candidates currently being developed, it is vital to evaluate which ones are ready to go forward for serious clinical evaluation, and which others need additional basic development or perhaps are ready to be discarded. "Vaccines live in the world of science," said Dr. Dani Bolognesi of Duke University Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina. Because there are both scientific "gaps" and "opportunities," it is appropriate to "take stock...and select the best way to proceed."

/ 11

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages #1-11 Image - Page 7 Plain Text - Page 7

About this Item

Title
Panel to Review GP160 Vaccine Candidate: Report of the Meeting
Author
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Canvas
Page 7
Publication
1992-11-18
Subject terms
reports
Item type:
reports

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0463.005
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cohenaids/5571095.0463.005/8

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes, with permission from their copyright holder(s). If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission.

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/cohenaids:5571095.0463.005

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Panel to Review GP160 Vaccine Candidate: Report of the Meeting." In the digital collection Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0463.005. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 6, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.