Panel to Review GP160 Vaccine Candidate: Report of the Meeting
Mr. Dobson also endorsed the value of comparing several vaccine candidate products in a large-scale clinical trial. Such an approach improves efficiency and would avoid the danger of putting high expectations on a single product. Even a trial involving several vaccines could prove wasteful if it is not carefully planned, he warned. "If we do significant scientific studies, we will get something out of our $20 million; that's very important." For instance, obtaining measurements of CD4 cell levels in such population groups (or in selected subgroups), although cumbersome, is an undertaking that should be taken into careful consideration, particularly as alternative, increasingly consistent simplified methods for obtaining such measurements become available. Additional special population considerations. Good arguments can also be made for conducting HIV vaccine clinical trials in infants, children, and pregnant women, according to pediatrician Dr. Diana Wara from the University of California, San Francisco. Children tend to make good "captured populations" for the sake of conducting vaccine trials. Moreover, in terms of HIV disease, infected children tend to develop symptoms rapidly, suggesting that the clinical efficacy of a therapeutic vaccine could be assessed relatively quickly if it were being tested in such populations. In addition, the ability of candidate vaccines to prevent HIV transmission could be addressed by testing its impact on HIVinfected pregnant women and their newborn infants. Of course, such studies would leave doubts about extrapolating results to adult populations, Dr. Wara noted. Nonetheless, several phase I clinical trials using several different vaccine products are being planned for populations of pregnant women and of newborn children, and they are expected to begin by mid 1993. 10
About this Item
- Title
- Panel to Review GP160 Vaccine Candidate: Report of the Meeting
- Author
- National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
- Canvas
- Page 10
- Publication
- 1992-11-18
- Subject terms
- reports
- Series/Folder Title
- Government Response and Policy > Law > gp160 trials and controversy > National Institute of Health (U.S.) GP160 Meeting, Blue-Ribbon Panel (1992)
- Item type:
- reports
Technical Details
- Collection
- Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection
- Link to this Item
-
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0463.005
- Link to this scan
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cohenaids/5571095.0463.005/11
Rights and Permissions
The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes, with permission from their copyright holder(s). If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission.
Related Links
IIIF
- Manifest
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/cohenaids:5571095.0463.005
Cite this Item
- Full citation
-
"Panel to Review GP160 Vaccine Candidate: Report of the Meeting." In the digital collection Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0463.005. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 7, 2025.