[Minutes, Advisory Committee to the Director GP-160 Meeting (1992: Bethesda, Maryland)]

1 And one may be different enough so that we
2 can either decide that the results are going to be
3 semi-extrapolatable or not.
4 DR. ROBBINS: We could get some of that
5 data analysis back.
6 MR. DOBSON: I wanted to answer Dr.
7 Burke's question. I know from a community standpoint
8 and a scientific standpoint that this is a major
9 research priority. Of everything that we are aware
10 that the Army is doing, it is by far in a way the most
11 important thing that you're doing from our
12 perspective. That's my take on that answer, whether
13 it's a priority or not.
14 I think while the motivation of those
15 people who initiated the money that exists is
16 questionable, I do believe that the spirit of the
17 legislation is clearly pointed at testing vaccines in
18 infected people. I think the spirit of the
19 legislation turned out to be good, again, regardless
20 of where it came from. I think that we should stick
21 within the spirit of the legislation.
22 Quite honestly, as I said before, I think
NEAL R. GROSS
COURT REPORTERS.ND TRANSCRIBERS
1325 RHODE ISLAMD AVENUE, N.W.
[phone] WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005 [phone]