[Letter to Quentin N. Burdick from Kay Holcombe]
OCT- 15- 1. 1 FRMI-I FIA L E ISLAT I E AFFA I R TO 9023 9564 - Page 2 - The Honorable Quentin N. Burdick characteristics of HIV, it seems likely that vaccinated subjects in an HIV vaccine efficacy study would need to be followed for at least two years. With regard to your second question concerning how many different human efficacy trials could be run in the United States, more than one controlled pivotal efficacy study could be conducted concurrently in the United States. Likewise, more than one vaccine could be evaluated. However, at the time when one vaccine is proved to be effective, placebo controlled trials would be discontinued. Subsequent trials would need to be head-to-head comparison trials, i.e., the effective vaccine versus the investigational vaccine. Comparison trials, for example to prove equivalence, require more resources to conduct because larger sample sizes are required. N inf ctetd members of high risk groups, i.e., where 30-50% of subjects are already infected and the practices that lead to infection are continuing to occur in that specific group, are often good subjects for an efficacy trial. For example, homosexual males not practicing safe sex might be good subjects for a vaccine efficacy trial, obviously, persons already infected would not be subjects of prophylactic vaccine efficacy trials. Concerning your question on running tests on groups which may be at higher risk in the future, clinical trials of AIDS vaccines should be designed with anticipation of the future spread of the virus. Populations with a high prevalence of infection currently may prove to have a low frequency of new infections in the future, and vice versa. These dynamics should be taken into account. You also asked about testing vaccines outside the United State as an alternative to limiting efficacy testing to primates. With regard to our position on human efficacy studies conducted overseas, available data suggest that certain foreign sites would be appropriate for pivotal AIDS vaccine efficacy studies, especially to evaluate prevention of heterosexual transmission of HIV infection. It is quite likely that pivotal efficacy studies for an AIDS vaccine will be conducted outside the United States. FDA has previously accepted data to support licensure from foreign studies for a number of vaccine and therapeutic products. FDA would accept such foreign data from we ll-conductetwel - LmQnISoreQd trials as the definitive AIDS vaccine efficacy data to support licensure, if the studies addressed conditions of virus spread relevant to the United States. There would also
About this Item
- Title
- [Letter to Quentin N. Burdick from Kay Holcombe]
- Author
- Holdcombe, Kay
- Canvas
- Page #2
- Publication
- 1991-06-18
- Subject terms
- letters (correspondence)
- Series/Folder Title
- Government Response and Policy > Law > gp160 trials and controversy > Correspondence, National Institute of Health (U.S.)/ United States. Food and Drug Administration
- Item type:
- letters (correspondence)
Technical Details
- Collection
- Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection
- Link to this Item
-
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0462.002
- Link to this scan
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cohenaids/5571095.0462.002/2
Rights and Permissions
The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes, with permission from their copyright holder(s). If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission.
Related Links
IIIF
- Manifest
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/cohenaids:5571095.0462.002
Cite this Item
- Full citation
-
"[Letter to Quentin N. Burdick from Kay Holcombe]." In the digital collection Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0462.002. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 4, 2025.