Searchlight Vol. 3, no. 1

Gene Insertion Treatment Continued from page 8... peripheral blood CD4s or monocytes, as seems to be the current fashion, and surely not modified tumor cell lines, the de facto gold standard of current experimental research into HIV therapeutics. Using Gene Therapy It is possible to stop HIV at any point in its life cycle by withholding the gene it uses during that portion of the cycle. (Not all of the virus genes are used during various stages of the viral life cycle. For example, during infection one does not need a functioning TAT gene, while reverse transcriptase is not used during the production of new virus or viral budding.) Consequently, by removing the TAT gene, which the virus needs to go into active virus production, the HIV genome can be manipulated to produce virus which can infect only one time. Once this gene-manipulated virus has been created it is necessary to produce it in quantity so as to promote its use in gene therapy. How would one produce such a virus construct in any quantity, given the fact that while it can bind, enter, transform and integrate into a host genome, without the TAT gene it is unable to "turn on" or amplify itself to produce more virus? One possible answer lies in reintroducing TAT to the cell culture system, thereby complementing the defective gene product. This new virus construct is then able to produce more virus particles which can infect only once. A rather unique thing about HIV is that a cell can be infected multiple times by various strains of HIV. Therefore, it is possible for the HIV construct to infect a cell that is already infected with a naturally occurring or "wild type" HIV. (A wild type virus is any virus found in nature which is causing the disease under study. For example, there is a wild type polio virus and there is the attenuated strain of polio which is syntheticone causes the natural disease, the other generally doesn't.) If such a construct were given to a person with HIV, the wild HIV would complement the defect in the viral construct (because of the presence of TAT), allowing it to replicate. That is, this construct would function like wild type HIV as long as the patient was already HIV infected; in the absence of an HIV infection, it would be dormant. The Role of TK and Acyclovir Thymidine kinase (TK)-a gene from the herpes virus-is not normally found in HIV and can act as a bomb, if you will, when genetically placed in the construct. When TK is cloned into the HIV construct, the construct will produce the TK enzyme any time the cell tries to produce HIV. Why is this of value? The drug acyclovir (Zovirax) kills cells which are producing TK; if HIV can be altered to produce this substance, all cells which go into active HIV replication will become susceptible to killing by acyclovir-just as if they were herpes. Acyclovir is totally inert until a cell decides to start producing herpes: the herpes gene product TK activates acyclovir, converting it to acyclovir triphosphate, which kills the cell trying to produce herpes virus. If a cell should be molecularly immunized (that is, have a copy of the defective HIV TAT-minusand-TK-positive construct integrated into it), and the patient takes acyclovir, nothing will happen because the construct can't replicate or produce TK since it is defective in TAT and can't produce any of its gene products. However, should the cell have wild HIV actively producing TAT, the cell will also be producing TK and in the presence of acyclovir it will be killed prior to the release of any virus. Additionally, as the delivery system of this gene product is an HIV virus itself, this gene product will have a limited number of cells which it can infect, as HIV itself only infects CD4-bearing tissue. Therefore, this construct will only infect those tissues and not every cell in the body. In sum, the construct is essentially a gene delivery system. It can selectively deliver dormant genes to certain cells and is activated under very specific conditions, such as when the patient is taking acyclovir. Controlling the Experiment If too many cells start to die as a result of the acyclovir therapy, the acyclovir can be withdrawn and the killing will stop. The construct will then infect other cells once. This HIV construct is a programmed cell killer which destroys prior to the release of more virion when both HIV and acyclovir are present-otherwise, it has no effect. One would expect this to rid the body of all those cells actively producing virus, and to ignore cells not producing virus-with the possible exception of cells still infected but in a dormant state. Should these dormant wild type infected cells ever spring to life, they would be killed as long as the patient is taking acyclovir. Another Gene Insertion Option Finally, if this construct should work, the TKdependent, acyclovir-dependent killer of cells could be exchanged with another gene which would kill without the need for acyclovir. This might be a pseudomonal toxin gene or some other gene product which will kill the cell in which it is expressed. The TK gene requires not only that it be expressed but also that acyclovir be around for TK to convert to a poison; the pseudomonal toxin gene requires only that it be expressed, and nothing more. This would reduce the cost of treatment to a one-time immunization-a molecular immunization. This gene insertion theory represents one possible solution to the HIV problem. While it is being worked on by Dr. Zaki Salahuddin and associates, it is not yet available in a usable form. Thomasj. Magee, M.D. practices HIV medicine in Los Angeles and is a participating physician at SEARCHAlliance. SEARCH Alliance Extends Grateful Thanks to our Dedicated and Hardworking Volunteers: Richard Bloch April Klein Joel Pizzo Denis Chicola Carol Kravetz Claire Putnam Wanda Clark Nicole Kurland Carole Sharkey Gilbert Cornilliet Deane Lind Bob Stoltzfus Duane Doggett Margaret Malone Tim Trueman Michael Emery Simon Meara Joseph Von Teichert Sloan Fischer Michael O'Keefe Michael Werner Aileen Getty Carre Otis Antoine Wilson 0 0 0... 0 ].. [. [ [ o o SEARCHLIGHT January/February,1993 I-e.lee

/ 22

Actions

file_download Download Options Download this page PDF - Pages 1-20 Image - Page 11 Plain Text - Page 11

About this Item

Title
Searchlight Vol. 3, no. 1
Author
Search Alliance
Canvas
Page 11
Publication
Search Alliance
1993-01
Subject terms
newsletters
Item type:
newsletters

Technical Details

Link to this Item
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0447.017
Link to this scan
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cohenaids/5571095.0447.017/11

Rights and Permissions

The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes, with permission from their copyright holder(s). If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission.

Manifest
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/cohenaids:5571095.0447.017

Cite this Item

Full citation
"Searchlight Vol. 3, no. 1." In the digital collection Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0447.017. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 6, 2025.
Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.