Improving the Management of HIV Disease Vol. 6, no. 5 [World Conference on AIDS (12th: 1998: Geneva)]
International AIDS Society-USA retroviral therapy over the short term. The drugs that offer the most prolonged activity in partially-suppressive regimens without the rapid development of highlevel resistance are zidovudine, didanosine (with or without hydroxyurea), and stavudine. With protease inhibitors, lamivudine, or the NNRTI drugs (nevirapine, delavirdine, and efavirenz) used in intermittent courses, the selection of resistant strains would be expected, with less effective virus suppression with each "round" of intermittent therapy. DR CLOTET: Intermittent combination therapies could produce the emergence of drug-resistant virus if maximal HIV suppression is not achieved. This will favor the generation of many HIV-1 resistant isolates that could be transmitted, increasing the difficulty in the selection of initial regimens in developing countries. Intermittent therapies will not be cost-effective if they do not maximally suppress HIV-1 replication. -.RSSANETSI-I nr on augznging a registarted subpatient with + count of So ovudine multiple r added to line/lamivuent's plasma DR HAMMER: It is difficult to give a single response to this question as the answer truly depends on the options available to the patient. In the case described, a good initial antiretroviral response has been achieved as the CD4+ cell count has risen substantially and the viral load is detectable but low. Thus, the patient is at low risk of near-term clinical progression. In someone who had only taken zidovudine monotherapy, an aggressive approach is reasonable, including 2 new nRTIs such as stavudine/lamivudine, combined with a potent protease inhibitor. In someone who has had multiple nRTI exposure, a dual protease inhibitor regimen combined with an NNRTI such as efavirenz would be a reasonable option if one wanted to be aggressive and try to achieve maximal virus suppression. Alternatively, a more conservative approach would be to follow the patient carefully and defer addition of a protease inhibitor or NNRTI until there is further evidence of virologic failure. In someone in whom a protease inhibitor and nRTIs have failed, the options become more limited. The approach in this circumstance depends on the philosophy of the physician and patient as, for example, one might choose to wait for a greater degree of virologic failure before instituting a switch. However, it is advisable not to wait until the plasma HIV-1 RNA has risen above the 10,000 to 20,000 copies/mL range as it is becoming increasingly clear that the ability to successfully suppress virus in an individual who has experienced failure on a protease inhibitor--containing regimen is inversely related to the plasma HIV-1 RNA level. If one were to initiate a change in someone in whom indinavir/zidovudine/lamivudine has failed, one option would be to employ a dual-protease inhibitor regimen with a change of the nRTIs to stavudine plus didanosine and to consider addition of an NNRTI such as efavirenz. It should be noted that resistance testing may not be helpful in an individual with a viral load between 25 and 750 copies/mL as PCR amplification from the plasma is variable at these low levels, although the technology is continuously improving. DR FISCH L: For patients with advanced HIV disease who had taken nRTIs, adding lamivudine and indinavir provided clinical and survival benefits but did not necessarily result in maximal suppression of HIV replication as measured by both HIV RNA plasma levels and viral culture. Therefore, for the patient with prior zidovudine experience, a new regimen should include 2 new nRTIs, excluding zidovudine, and a protease inhibitor. Alternative regimens with 2 protease inhibitors, such as ritonavir/saquinavir, or an NNRTI, such as efavirenz, rather than a single protease inhibitor may be considered. A similar philosophy should be used for multiple nRTI experience: a combination of 3 new drugs, ones the patient has never taken and based on treatment history to which the virus is still likely to be susceptible. Phenotyping of the virus may assist the physician in identifying which drugs not to use. Such combination regimens can include nRTIs, NNRTIs, and 1 or 2 protease inhibitors. Regimens for protease inhibitor failures are more difficult to determine but should include 3 to 4 new drugs, whenever possible, to which the virus is still likely to be susceptible. Again, phenotyping of the virus may assist the physician in 24 IMPROVING THE MANAGEMENT OF HIV DISEASE
About this Item
- Title
- Improving the Management of HIV Disease Vol. 6, no. 5 [World Conference on AIDS (12th: 1998: Geneva)]
- Author
- International AIDS Society
- Canvas
- Page 24
- Publication
- International AIDS Society - USA
- 1998-12
- Subject terms
- reports
- Series/Folder Title
- Disease Management > AIDS Treatment > Specific Medications > Anti-retroviral reviews
- Item type:
- reports
Technical Details
- Collection
- Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection
- Link to this Item
-
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0303.007
- Link to this scan
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cohenaids/5571095.0303.007/24
Rights and Permissions
The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes, with permission from their copyright holder(s). If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission.
Related Links
IIIF
- Manifest
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/cohenaids:5571095.0303.007
Cite this Item
- Full citation
-
"Improving the Management of HIV Disease Vol. 6, no. 5 [World Conference on AIDS (12th: 1998: Geneva)]." In the digital collection Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0303.007. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 12, 2025.