Improving the Management of HIV Disease Vol. 6, no. 5 [World Conference on AIDS (12th: 1998: Geneva)]
QUESTIONS TO THE ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY AND RESISTANCE TESTING PANELS therapy. From the didanosine monotherapy arm of ACTG 175 we know that didanosine "buys" on average at least 2 years of increased CD4+ cell count and decreased plasma HIV RNA level in early HIV infection. Data on didanosine and hydroxyurea suggest that increased plasma HIV RNA suppression occurs with the combination, even when hydroxyurea is added after several years of didanosine exposure. The most efficient use of these 2 drugs may be to add hydroxyurea in response to evidence of progression (rising HIV RNA level, falling CD4+ cell count, or development of symptoms). This must be balanced against the risks of neutropenia and bone marrow suppression with long-term hydroxyurea use. DR MONTANER: Current therapeutic guidelines are based on the principle that high-level suppression of viral replication will be associated with decreased morbidity, mortality, and immunologic recovery. The difference between partially and highly suppressive regimens is largely attributable to the ability of the highly suppressive therapies to minimize the chances of viral rebound and therefore emergence of resistance. This is fundamentally responsible for the more profound and durable benefit associated with highly suppressive therapies. On the other hand, there is no doubt that partially suppressive therapeutic strategies have led to improved clinical outcomes as described by Dr Katzenstein above. I would be extremely hesitant to endorse a policy of using less than highly suppressive therapy (ie, triple-drug therapy) as this could open the door for policy makers to embrace suboptimal therapeutic strategies, which in my opinion should be strongly discouraged. DR VOLBERDING: Assuming a patient has established infection (infected for at least 6 months), it does not matter so much how long he or she has been infected. As far as we know, the current CD4+ cell count and viral load remain predictors of risk of complication of the disease and the rate the disease may progress. This patient has a normal CD4+ cell count but a rather high viral load. I would not urge him to begin treatment but would follow the CD4+ cell count closely, about every 3 months. I would recommend treatment if the CD4+ cell count begins to decline substantially, particularly if it falls below 500 cells/pL, and certainly before it reaches 350/pL or so. DR YENI: Given the continuum of increased risk of progression of HIV disease with increasing baseline plasma HIV RNA level, there is no "magic" threshold plasma HIV RNA value for deciding when to initiate therapy in patients with established HIV infection. The recommended range of 5000 to 10,000 copies/mL is a compromise incorporating some degree of approximation. In patients tested for plasma HIV RNA in the absence of recent immunization or ongoing infection, the test variability is 0.3 log (twofold), which is low, given the spectrum of observed RNA values. Increasing the number of tests to more than 2, in order to more accurately assess the baseline plasma HIV RNA level, would result in an excessive refinement, given the approximation of the recommended threshold value for therapy. Taking into account other parameters, such as changes in CD4+ cell count and plasma RNA level over time and patient commitment to therapy, is more appropriate at this stage of the decisionmaking process. DR SAAG: I agree, 2 baseline tests are generally adequate to make treatment decisions in this setting. In a patient with a CD4+ count above 500 cells/pL, most clinicians will not recommend that antiretroviral therapy be initiated until viral load values are confirmed to be at least 5000 to 10,000 copies/mL. It would be unusual for viral load values to fluctuate between 5000 and 30,000 copies/mL, for example. Therefore, 2 baseline tests should confirm whether the viral load is in the range where treatment should be initiated; if the levels are in the "observe" range (below 5000 to 10,000 copies/mL), follow-up HIV RNA values should be obtained about every 3 months. bilityof 2ble HIV baseline i which nent atient unt in range? 15 VOLUME 6, OCTOBER 1998
About this Item
- Title
- Improving the Management of HIV Disease Vol. 6, no. 5 [World Conference on AIDS (12th: 1998: Geneva)]
- Author
- International AIDS Society
- Canvas
- Page 15
- Publication
- International AIDS Society - USA
- 1998-12
- Subject terms
- reports
- Series/Folder Title
- Disease Management > AIDS Treatment > Specific Medications > Anti-retroviral reviews
- Item type:
- reports
Technical Details
- Collection
- Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection
- Link to this Item
-
https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0303.007
- Link to this scan
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cohenaids/5571095.0303.007/15
Rights and Permissions
The University of Michigan Library provides access to these materials for educational and research purposes, with permission from their copyright holder(s). If you decide to use any of these materials, you are responsible for making your own legal assessment and securing any necessary permission.
Related Links
IIIF
- Manifest
-
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/api/manifest/cohenaids:5571095.0303.007
Cite this Item
- Full citation
-
"Improving the Management of HIV Disease Vol. 6, no. 5 [World Conference on AIDS (12th: 1998: Geneva)]." In the digital collection Jon Cohen AIDS Research Collection. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/5571095.0303.007. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 12, 2025.